The evidence suggests that hunter-gatherer societies have a conservationist ethic is that the hunter-gatherer communities often harvest a lot of herbs and fruits and take in animal species and it is one that still exist in the 21st century.
- They often avoids developments in their environment.
<h3>Who were the Hunter-Gatherer Societies?</h3>
This is said to be the early humans who are known to often work to survived by hunting and gathering of fruit, herbs and animals.
Note that The evidence suggests that hunter-gatherer societies have a conservationist ethic is that the hunter-gatherer communities often harvest a lot of herbs and fruits and take in animal species and it is one that still exist in the 21st century.
- They often avoids developments in their environment.
Learn more about hunter-gatherer from
brainly.com/question/756329
#SPJ1
Answer:
Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land. Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision helped form the basis for most subsequent law in the United States regarding Native Americans. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.Worcester's decision was important in terms of the Native American rights because he was there to help the Native Americans not be scared of the Supreme Court. That they can fight and stay where they are. In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice John Marshall, the Court held that the Georgia act, under which Worcester was prosecuted, violated the Constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States.
Explanation:
Answer:
C
<em>Hope that helps!</em>
Explanation:
Answer:d.
Explanation:
State and local courts must honor both federal law and the laws of the other states. ... Claims based on federal laws will permit the federal court to take jurisdiction over the whole case, including any state issues raised. In those cases, the federal court is said to exercise “pendent jurisdiction” over the state claims.
I have been to China and have been to the great wall and etc. SO i am a expert so ya