I would not say, "late summer", because <u>Siege of Yorktown</u> initial movements started on September 28th and British troops surrender led by <u>Lieutenant General Charles Cornwallis</u> happened on October 19, 1781, at Yorktown, Virginia. Franco-American commanders were <u>General George Washington</u> and <u>Jean-Baptiste Donatien de Vimeur, Comte de Rochambeau</u>. <u>Siege of Yorktown</u> was the last major land battle of the<em><u> American Revolutionary War</u></em>, as the surrender by <u>Cornwallis</u>, and the capture of his army, prompted the British government to negotiate an end to the conflict. After the British surrender, <u>Washington</u> sent Tench Tilghman to report the victory to Congress. The Treaty of Paris was signed on September 3, 1783, formally ending the war.
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
The U.S. gained access to Mexican seaports and paid Mexico five million dollars, but Mexico kept its territory.