1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ymorist [56]
3 years ago
10

PLEASE ANYONE WHO HAS READ THE LEAP USE THE A.C.E METHOD TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION

English
1 answer:
Archy [21]3 years ago
5 0

First of all, if the story would be in chronological order, there would be no story at all. This is because the main character of the story, Anna, won't tell the narrator, her daughter, a lot about her past. "She has kept no squinted costume, no photographs, no fliers or posters from that part of her youth".

Because the narrator tells the story in the present and uses flashbacks is the reason that she can unify certain themes, such as the three times her mother saved her life because of her leaps. "I owe her my existence three times". These three leaps the narrator owes her life might be: when Anna Saves herself when she falls from the trapeze, when she falls in love with the narrator's father, and when she saves the narrator life from a fire by climbing to the room where the narrator is trapped.

You might be interested in
Which format would best inform the public about key issues that face a small town?
aliya0001 [1]
C is the correct answer I believe
7 0
3 years ago
Short poem on brave soldiers
iogann1982 [59]
Hear them marching
Down the street
Hear there hearts beat

They, brave soldiers,
Risk their lives
To save our country and their families

Oh, them boys and men
Saying to their homes goodbye
I shall save our country

Veterans Day is a day
To remember these brave soldiers
And if you just listen carefully to the waves of our flag

You'll still hear them marching and their hearts beating 

I hope this helps! :D
6 0
4 years ago
What is an aphorism? Cite correctly two of Benjamin Franklin's aphorisms from pages 33 and 34 of your books and explain what you
monitta

Answer::

An aphorism is an observation about a particular something that holds a more general truth. For instance,

"If it isn't broken, don't fix it." means - don't mess with things that are working fine (I once heard a version of this at an engineering event - "Better is the enemy of good", which referred to the fact that students would take a working design and try to make it better but would in fact end up with a mess.

Aphorisms are a clever way to get people to pay attention to a point you are trying to make. I knew someone who would make up his own as conversation closers or as a way to get his point across. One of the ones I'll never forget was:

You can't stomp a snake with both feet in a bucket. I mean... how can you argue with that?!?!?!

Benjamin Franklin used aphorisms to get his points across - whether it was in the pursuit of better relations with neighbours:

Write injuries in the dust, benefits in marble (you know you are going to have disagreements with neighbours from time to time, so let the disagreements slide but remember the good forever)

personal health:

Early to bed, early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise

work ethic:

No gains without pains

and other such - perhaps we could call these "personal advice". He had another target with his aphorisms - politics:

If we don't all hang together, we'll all hang separately - this referred to the Founding Fathers of what became the USA - in the lead up to the Revolutionary War with England, not all of the Founding Fathers were onboard with declaring independence and fighting for it. The debate, as might be imagined, was fierce. Franklin, with this aphorism, simply states that If we don't all hang together - that is, form a united front, then we'll all hang separately - that is, they will all be hung for treason and each person will get their own rope.

7 0
3 years ago
what makes good people do bad things, how does the structure of the article make the authors argument more effective
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

seduced into evil

Explanation:

in fact, the classic shock experiment by social psychologist Stanley Milgram, PhD, showed that when given an order by someone in authority, people would deliver what they believe to be extreme levels of electrical shock to other study participants who answered questions incorrectly.

2 answer for ya

5 0
3 years ago
You should evaluate how a source relates to your topic
brilliants [131]
Answer: true

explanation: you shouldn’t use a source that isn’t related to what you’re writing about
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which two thesis statements are best for a literary analysis essay on recurring themes in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet?
    8·1 answer
  • atticus finch considers that it is incredible that the jury took a few hours to convict tom robinson. explain the significance o
    8·1 answer
  • Should colleges require students to approve a departmental comprehensive examination before graduating? Discuss this thoroughly
    10·1 answer
  • (1) One morning, when Gregor Samsa woke from troubled dreams, he found himself transformed in his bed into a horrible vermin. He
    14·2 answers
  • ONLY FOR PEOPLE WHO KNOW ARABIC
    8·1 answer
  • Posttest
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • 13. What is the author's main purpose in the
    15·1 answer
  • *PLEASE ANSWER!!!, I DONT GET IT !! *
    13·1 answer
  • Which approach best describes the tone of the excerpt?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!