Answer:
In colonial America, losing property is essentially the same as losing their rights as well as their citizenship. To be a citizen AND be able to vote, one had to be a land-owning, white male. Females, non-land owning white males, and any other coloured people were not allowed to vote during this time period.
~
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
Answer:
The women performed most chores.
Explanation:
The women do all the labor and the men hunt and go at their pleasure.
Answer:
Even though it failed it still raised sectional tension between the north and the south, this was one of the causes of the civil war. The very foundation of the southern economy was based on slavery, so they feared that it's abolition would result to their fall. Slave owners also feared that their own slaves would turn against them and cause riots and destruction of their property.
Explanation:
that's all I have ✌️
Answer:
Executive Order 9066 is the forced relocation of all Japanese Americans in America into internment camps during World War II. After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, many Americans were suspicious of the Japanese in America, and Roosevelt thought that they could be a potential threat. He justified the order by claiming that they were dangerous to national security.
Explanation:
