He was saying that the sun is in the middle of the solar system and the church was saying the earth was in the center. This means that the church was lying to the people and this meant that he was challenging the church and tradition . they resolved thus by having him excommunicated
Answer:
To fund its European wars.
Among the natural disasters or natural dangers that a farmer of the Middle East could face, the most common are:
Drought: One of the main problems in the Middle East is droughtiness. Water scarcity have always been a problem in this region and being a farmer in the middle of this situation could result in big problems when you grow your crops. A way to prevent this natural danger, would be by having enough water storage near the farm or crops and a better water management. It is highly important to check Drought monitors or Drought impacts to study where the farm could be less affected by this rough season.
Flooding: opposite to droughtiness, we could have the other face of the coin, that is tons of water that could negatively hit the crops. The pro during this season is that water can be storage in great amounts for the previous season, however, during this situation would be useful to count with channels that could spread the water and to invest in infrastructure that could save the crops from getting tons of water into them. And once again, check the recent studies of the previous weather reports.
1) The primary goal of the Anti-Defamation League is ( C ) to defend jews against verbal attacks and false statements. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is an international Jewish non-governmental organization created to fight anti-Semitism in all possible ways.
2) Theodore Roosevelt proposed the Square Deal to ( C ) keep the wealthy from taking advantage of small business owners.
Answer:
Its probably A
Explanation:
I don't really think that any of those arguments are actually good. However, answer B is wrong because political parties won't necessarily lose financial support if somebody votes against them. it also doesn't really fit as an argument to why you should vote even though the other party will probably win. Number C is not logical because you don't just strt parties because the party you support loses. That way all the existing parties will lose votes and not only the ones you are against. Answer D is just a very bad argument. Think about, would you change where you proably live all your life just because they have more influence on the vote? What about your job, friends and family. And if they mean for you to fly or ride to another state just to vote and then come back, that bad too because it's expensive.
