Answer:because people don’t live on water
Explanation:
around the equator is still hot, we just aren’t mermaids so we don’t live there.
Russia's new free-market economy enabled more goods to become available soon after the command economy fell, and many average Russians were able to own their own businesses.
Explanation:
With the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia experienced many changes, and one of the major changes was the economy. During the communism, the economy was of command type, but after the fall of communism it changed to free market economy. While this has not resulted in significant increase in the standard of living among the average Russians, it did had other big effects, such as:
- more goods became available
- the people were able to create and own their own businesses
- the government is not controlling the production of goods in general
- the consumers became the main judge as to what and how much will be produced
Many Russians captured the opportunity to develop their own businesses once the economy changed. This resulted in an economy that started to gradually develop and get back on track. The average Russian was able to buy whatever they wanted and how much they wanted, with the empty rafts in the stores becoming part of the past. Weirdly enough, the price of the goods an services in Russia have not dropped significantly because of the competition, but instead have remained largely unchanged, and it is believed that the reason for that is the oligarchy.
Learn more about free market economy brainly.com/question/12258713
#learnwithBrainly
Arctic, Atlantic, pacific, Indian and southern oceans.
North America, Europe, South America, Africa, Australia and Asia
<span>The answer is none of the above.
You create a patrol map by mapping the distance it takes to travel from one landmark to another.</span>
<span>1) Would depend on what you were trying to date. It you were trying to date the crystallisation of the parental magma, most likely U-Pb dating on zircon or perhaps monazite if present. Both minerals occur commonly as igneous minerals in granite and are relatively resistant to metamorphism, so stand a reasonable chance of retaining the crystallization age. The U-Pb system is also a long-lived decay system, so is appropriate to the timescale.. If you were trying to date the age of the 'stuff' the granite was made from (i.e. when the 'stuff' was extracted from the mantle) Hf isotopes. If you were trying to date the cooling history of the granite, a combination of U-Pb (on minerals such as titanite), Ar-Ar and Rb-Sr dating. The Rb-Sr and K-Ar (which Ar-Ar dating is based upon) and the Lu-Hf system are also long-lived systems, which are appropriate to the timescalse but typically record different information from the U-Pb system in zircon. In the case of the Rb-Sr and K-Ar system, they are prone to disturbance by heating, which makes them useful for dating the cooling and uplift history of rocks. </span>
<span>2) Is a tricky measurement. You could use Ar-Ar dating or U238-U234-Pb206 dating. But both are analytically difficult because both the U-Pb and K-Ar system are based on decays that are slower than is optimal for the age range. There is not really a better alternative though. Both methods, are however applicable to young igneous rocks, with care. </span>
<span>3) C14 dating. The material is geologically young and organic, so if it has remained closed system, C14 is probably applicable. </span>
<span>4) None. You would look for volcanic ash beds in the sedimentary sequence and do U-Pb dating on the contained zircons. With a few exceptions, fossils cannot be directly dated.</span>