Reparations for slavery is the application of the concept of reparations to victims of slavery and/or their descendants. There are concepts for reparations in legal philosophy and reparations in transitional justice. Throughout history reparations for slavery have been both given by legal ruling in court and/or given voluntarily (without court rulings) by individuals and institutions. Reparations can take numerous forms, including: individual monetary payments, settlements, scholarships, waiving of fees, and systemic initiatives to offset injustices, land-based compensation related to independence, apologies and acknowledgements of the injustices,token measures, such as naming a building after someone, or the removal of monuments and renaming of streets that honor slave owners and defenders of slavery.
Answer:
Both the Incas and Aztecs believed in and worshipped the sun god. Huitzilopochtli, also spelled Uitzilopochtli, also called Xiuhpilli and Totec “Our Lord”, Aztec sun and war god, one of the two principal deities of Aztec religion, often represented in art as either a hummingbird or an eagle. And Inti, also called Apu-punchau, in Inca religion, the sun god; he was believed to be the ancestor of the Incas. Inti was at the head of the state cult, and his worship was imposed throughout the Inca empire. He was usually represented in human form, his face portrayed as a gold disk from which rays and flames extended.
They both practiced and participated in human sacrifices. And had built large temples to do the sacrifices in and had built special temples to worship their god. The Incas and Aztecs both had a polytheistic religion meaning they only believed in one god.
By the following statement above the march on washington was an attempt to do: a. pressure congress to pass a civil right law.
the march caused great concern in J.F. kennedy era, the march would undermine pending civil right legislation and international image of the united states.
hope this help
Answer:
B: Protect the right of black citizens to vote. (This was right for me I'm not sure its different for everyone)
Explanation:
Urban growth in the context of structural adjustment, currency devaluations, state retrenchments, and little or no housing provision.• Viewing the state as a 'market enabler' led to theled to the privatisation of utilities and services, and massive decreases in provision;• For individuals, their various needs - affordable commodities, accommodation close to jobs, security, and the possibility of owning property - were<span>simply ignored by the imposition of ill-suited neoliberal 'boot-strap capitalism'.</span>