Answer:
Articles Of Confederation!
Explanation:
Answer: During the time of war anyone of Japanese decent was put in internment camps
Explanation:
Executive 9066
The correct answer is C). Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not.
The statement that describes a major difference between the international responses to genocide in Bosnia and in Rwanda is <em>ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not.
</em>
The genocide in Rwanda was in 1994. Members of the Hutu(majority) killed 800,000 people in a horrible ethnic cleansing against the Tutsi(minority).
During July 11 to 13, 1995, the Bosnian Serb Army killed almost 8,000 Bosnian Muslims that were in the United Nations “safe area” of Srebrenica.
In the case of Bosnia, it led to a military response from international forces. The U.S. and some allies sent diplomats and army personnel to implement the Dayton Accords. But the case of Rwanda was different. Rwanda was left alone, so they decided on its political future
.
Although the Texas Constitution provides that the governor is the chief executive, it actually establishes<u> </u><u>a plural </u>executive by dividing executive powers among several independently elected officers.
<u>Explanation:</u>
By dividing power across various elected officials, as per the plural executive government system, the authority of the executive, which would be the governor or president, is limited. Texas utilizes a plural executive which denotes the Governor's powers are limited and dispersed amongst other representatives of government.
In other words, there's not one representative of the Texas government who is entirely responsible for the Texas Executive Branch. And all executives are elected individually, rendering them accountable to the public directly, not to the governor.