I'm guessing it would be Argumentation by the war the sentence is typed
<span>Based on this passage, the author most likely will argue that D. Glen Canyon would have been better off without the dam.
The author describes what the Canyon looks like now - there is no flora, and even less fauna because the animals have nothing to feed on. It is visually pleasing, but at what cost? The author then describes what the Canyon looked like before the dam was built and he implies that it looked so much better.
</span>
Answer:
They might desire an active role in world transformation. They are hopeful for a better future as a "strange attractor".
They might believe they are pragmatists in this world, even as they imagine and work for another.
People of the future have a long term perspective.
Answer:
Well I don't really know who Josh is??? We can't write an essay without reading the book. p.s. sry but i wont do that anyway. i dont like essays lol.
