1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valkas [14]
4 years ago
6

Freud believed that human behavior was motivated by unconscious conflicts that were almost always ______ or ______ in nature.

Social Studies
2 answers:
dolphi86 [110]4 years ago
5 0
<span>Freud believed that human behavior was motivated by unconscious conflicts that were almost always sexual or aggressive in nature.

According to Freud's theory, from childhood itself our behavior is unconsciously perpetuated by sexual attraction towards our of parent of the sex opposite to ours. This is known as the Oedipus Complex (in male children) and the Electra complex (in female children). These complexes are also characterized by unconscious conflicts that are aggressive in nature with parents of the same sex as ours.</span>
Anna007 [38]4 years ago
5 0
<span>Freud believed that human behavior was motivated by unconscious conflicts that were almost always aggressive or sexual in nature. Humans like most animals are aggressive and sexual especially males. Males are more aggressive do to the way their brain function. Like animals in the wild, males use this aggression and sexual nature to seek other mates and fend off competition. As society has progressed these traits have been suppressed, but they can never truly go away.</span>
You might be interested in
Explain how Islam came to and flourished in West Africa.
12345 [234]

Answer:

Islam came to North Africa because Muslim refugees fleeing persecution in the Arab peninsula went there for refugee. In east Africa Christianity shifted to Islam. African traders realized that adopting Islam would bring them more trade becuase two spheres of Islam and trade are closely intertwined. Some societies were matrilineal, and these changed to a patrilineal system. Eventually the religion spreader east, as each emperor adopted Islam.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15479694#readmore

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
the blank clause allows congress to stretch the delegated powers listed in the constitution to cover many other subjects
Ugo [173]
"Necessary and Proper."

This means that the government has the power they want as long as it is necessary and proper.
3 0
3 years ago
Why was the Articles of Confederation discarded?
Archy [21]
The Articles of Confederation were discarded in favor of a stronger more centralized federal government because of problems in governing that were associated with weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles failed to allow the national government to collect taxes, resolve inter-state disputes, and govern effectively more generally. Therefore, at the Constitutional Convention they decided to scrap the Articles and write an entirely new Constitution. 
4 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
__________ is the mighty list of federal projects, grants, and contracts available to cities, businesses, colleges, and institut
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

Pork Barrel

Explanation:

Pork Barrel is a derogatory term rooted in American English and refers to the allocation of the resources to a small segment of people in exchange for political support, which are funded by a larger community. Since the 1880's the pork-barrel politics is represented in the executive and legislative branch of the United States. When a government leader use resources in localized projects and in his area of influence and the cost of which is beard by common taxpayers it is denoted by the metaphor Pork Barrel politics.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Chinese isolation affect trade for China and for the world?
    10·1 answer
  • Part D
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the gap between rich ans poor in Latin America grow after independence.
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following best typifies the meaning of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?
    14·1 answer
  • After noting that a majority of professional basketball players are African-American, Ervin concluded that African-Americans are
    10·1 answer
  • Rachel finds a new apartment that she loves in the center of downtown, but she ultimately decides against renting it because the
    10·1 answer
  • In what way did Andrew Jackson assume command (unlike previous presidents)?
    14·1 answer
  • List five details you see with reference to economy of the civilization?
    6·1 answer
  • 3. Which goddess would I make this prayer to: Dear goddess. Please bring
    5·1 answer
  • Imagine you are very wealthy and have a large home with many possessions. However, your home is located many miles away from the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!