Answer:
The Civil War erupted from a variety of long-standing tensions and disagreements about American life and politics. For nearly a century, the people and politicians of the Northern and Southern states had been clashing over the issues that finally led to war: economic interests, cultural values, the power of the federal government to control the states, and, most importantly, slavery in American society.
While some of these differences might have been resolved peacefully through diplomacy, the institution of slavery was not among them.
With a way of life steeped in age-old traditions of white supremacy and a mainly agricultural economy that depended on the labor of enslaved people, the Southern states viewed enslavement as essential to their very survival.
Explanation:
i know its more than 2 reasons but i mine as well write a few more.
Here is the answer. Historians evaluate evidence to determine if it is reliable by asking experts questions about the evidence. They would need the help of other experts in different fields in relation to the evidences that they have gathered. Historians are people who<span> study the past and write about historical events. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
Among the positives of the French Revolution were reformed such as raising the level of life for all citizens of these countries and allowing anybody, not just nobles, to pursue high public office. The people of the French Revolution made numerous positive contributions to different societies as a result of their deeds.
Explanation:
The correct answer is: I and IV
Imagine a very large town in the center of a uniformly fertile plain; an isotropic space. Beyond the fertile space extends a desert that isolates the town from the rest of the world. There are no other populations. The only market buys all the agricultural production of the region, and is transported by the shortest route (a straight line).
In these conditions all men behave similarly in economic matters, that is, they have the same needs and abilities, produce equally and have a total knowledge of space and rationally conducts to achieve maximum performance, is the economic man. The differences in the cost of transport are taken into account depending on the distance, the quantity and the perishability of the merchandise.
Obviously, in the real world there are no given isotropic space conditions, there are differences in the fertility of the land, differences in topography and access to markets due to communication routes (faster or cheaper), and there is usually more than one market in the region. All this would cause the concentric model to adopt an irregular aspect, although basically valid. Let us think that Von Thünen's model belongs to the beginning of the 19th century, when national markets and modern means of transport, such as railways, were not yet created.
<span>When FDR said there was nothing to fear
but fear itself</span> he wanted to instill confidence in
the American people, to make them believe that with his leadership they really
had nothing to worry about. He was referring to uncertainty about the future
due to depression and worries about the prospect of turning around the U.S.
economy
