1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BartSMP [9]
3 years ago
9

Expertise is like knowledge except

English
2 answers:
Dennis_Churaev [7]3 years ago
5 0
you know more that the normal amount of knowledge you need to know or you are really good at something so it is easy for you to explain it to someone
seropon [69]3 years ago
5 0
Expertise: something ur really good at
Knowledge: something u know
You might be interested in
Question 7 5 points)
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

The narrative will change depending on the narrator's tone and point of view.​

Explanation:

When planning to write a story, it's important to carefully pick a narrator, because the narrative will change depending on the narrator's tone and point of view.

A narrative's point of view is the perspective from which it is told. The first-person and third-person narratives are the most common, but the second-person narrative is used sometimes, as well. Depending on how much information they have an insight into, narrators can be limited or omniscient. An omniscient narrator is a narrator who knows about all events that take place in the story and about all character's thoughts and feelings. A limited narrator doesn't possess this much knowledge.

The narrator's tone is the narrator's attitude toward or feelings about the events that take place, about the subject.

We can see that one story can be told from many perfectives, which is why it's important to carefully pick its narrator.

3 0
3 years ago
How did people predict the experiment would go?<br> (From “The Perils of Obedience)
stepladder [879]

Answer:

If an authority figure ordered you to deliver a 400-volt electrical shock to another person, would you follow orders? Most people would answer with an adamant "no." However, the Milgram obedience experiment aimed to prove otherwise.

During the 1960s, Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted a series of obedience experiments that led to some surprising results. These results offer a compelling and disturbing look at the power of authority and obedience.

7 0
3 years ago
I just need to know what gingerly means in that sentence
devlian [24]

Answer: carefully

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Reread the section "Protein Power." Which piece of evidence in this
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

Meat is a great source of protien

Explanation:

just took it on i-ready

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Paraphrase Madison’s premise in these lines. Why is this a premise and not a claim? The Federalist No
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Summary

Madison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines factions as groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others.

Both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions. The state governments have not succeeded in solving this problem; in fact, the situation is so problematic that people are disillusioned with all politicians and blame government for their problems. Consequently, a form of popular government that can deal successfully with this problem has a great deal to recommend it.

Given the nature of man, factions are inevitable. As long as men hold different opinions, have different amounts of wealth, and own different amount of property, they will continue to fraternize with people who are most similar to them. Both serious and trivial reasons account for the formation of factions but the most important source of faction is the unequal distribution of property. Men of greater ability and talent tend to possess more property than those of lesser ability, and since the first object of government is to protect and encourage ability, it follows that the rights of property owners must be protected. Property is divided unequally, and, in addition, there are many different kinds of property. and men have different interests depending upon the kind of property they own. For example, the interests of landowners differ from those who own businesses. Government must not only protect the conflicting interests of property owners but must, at the same time, successfully regulate the conflicts between those with and without property.

To Madison, there are only two ways to control a faction: to remove its causes and to control its effects. The first is impossible. There are only two ways to remove the causes of a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. Destroying liberty is a "cure worse then the disease itself," and the second is impracticable. The causes of factions are thus part of the nature of man and we must deal with their effects and accept their existence. The government created by the Constitution controls the damage caused by such factions.

The framers established a representative form of government, a government in which the many elect the few who govern. Pure or direct democracies (countries in which all the citizens participate directly in making the laws) cannot possibly control factious conflicts. This is because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against the actions of an obnoxious individual or a strong majority. Direct democracies cannot effectively protect personal and property rights and have always been characterized by conflict.

If the new plan of government is adopted, Madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men,­ the best of America. Theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition, but the opposite might happen. Men who are members of particular factions, or who have prejudices or evil motives might manage, by intrigue or corruption, to win elections and then betray the interests of the people. However, the possibility of this happening in a large country, such as the United States, is greatly reduced. The likelihood that public office will be held by qualified men is greater in large countries because there will be more representatives chosen by a greater number of citizens. This makes it more difficult for the candidates to deceive the people. Representative government is needed in large countries, not to protect the people from the tyranny of the few, but to guard against the rule of the mob.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is NOT an aspect of postmodernism?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a fronted adverbial
    6·1 answer
  • What role do pets play on families
    15·2 answers
  • What are the adjectives and adverbs in "I frequently feel better when we have nice weather"
    7·1 answer
  • Why did mattie want to take the twins to the coffee house
    8·2 answers
  • If a candidate contests an election, who usually decides what to do next?
    15·2 answers
  • Does studying too much at the same time make it hard for your brain to process the information?
    12·2 answers
  • Think of a situation when you could have given a better response
    7·1 answer
  • When you listen to a lecture, the information is held in ____ memory until you write it in your notes.
    15·1 answer
  • A financial institution sent messages about strong financial habits to two groups. Group A received the messages via email on a
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!