<span>This is the behaviorist theory. This viewpoint takes into account all the ways in which we learn about our world and how we try to link these learned behaviors with our own thought processes. In addition, the behaviorist viewpoint is heavily in favor of seeing these behaviors as shaped by our outside environment, instead of being unconsciously determined.</span>
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
I know this because, i just took the test so the answer is B (Georgia is unable to allocate the money as it wants.)
Answer:
Freedom enough for the criticism to be the positive one.
Explanation:
First of all if you are at the top of one company you have to use your authority to improve the work of employees. But criticism should never be based on punctuation, elevated tone, or any kind of force.
Freedom to criticize primarily should be in form of a feedback. The way in which a employee will be criticized must be be made by comments about his work, not to criticize "a person".
Criticism must start with asking questions and listening to the employee, understanding and deciding what to do next. It should not be over-criticized, but rather small-dose criticism is recommended. It is also very important that criticism be at the right time when needed, not delayed.
