B. Land rights could either be inherited or earned through war.
5. According to John Green, Luther's success with the rebellion stemmed from his ability to, initially, make his teachings resonate with peasants and youths. But this resonance did not last long. Luther soon turned his teachings against the peasants in favor of the kings and princes.
6. <em>Luther's or the peasants' argument</em> about serfdom was correct. No one should endure bondage or serfdom, with increasing taxation without representation.
7. The reasons that Princes and Kings defied the Pope and broke away from the Church were<em> to possess landed property formerly owned by the Church (</em><em>Wealth</em><em>)</em>, <em>decide how they practiced religion (e.g. </em><em>divorce</em><em>)</em>, <em>and boost their </em><em>military powers</em><em> </em>(making people loyal to the government instead of to the Church).
8. The Reformation was ultimately a wrong move because it split the Church, creating too many denominations with different and confusing interpretations of the Bible. However, there are some valuable lessons. It separated the Church from the state. It created religious freedom.
The Church has no business mingling with the state. The Church and the state should remain separate, complementing each other like institutions. Governments should not regulate religion because it is a <em>personal endeavor</em>. It is a <em>spiritual enterprise</em> and not <em>social or economic</em>. There are some aspects of life in which the state should not involve itself. Otherwise, individual rights suffer jeopardy.
Thus, the Reformation was a bag of the good and the ugly. Reformation should happen <em>within and not without</em> the Church. Luther's outcome seems to be projected from Satan. Any Reformation outside the Church is no Reformation. It is simply Separation and Division, generating Confusion.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/18535898
When interest rates are increased, borrowing money becomes more expensive. This translates into both individuals and buisnesses having to slow down their enconomic growth, because financing their activities or production also becomes more expensive.
The Federal Reserve has the <u>double-task</u> of keeping prices manageable in a flourishing economy while keeping unemployment as low as possible. When there's inflation, it's been proven that slowing down the economy by increasing interest rates, tends to reduce inflation. That's why it's a good option. We have to keep in mind, however, that this will raise unemployment as a collateral effect.
As you can see, there's no easy answer when it comes to balancing all factors at the same time.
Hope this helps!
Never had this s questionnaires
1 is Lend-lease program
2 is Isolationists
3 is Embargo
