1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mariarad [96]
3 years ago
5

James Madison (Father of the Constitution) wrote the Bill of Rights that would be

History
2 answers:
lilavasa [31]3 years ago
8 0
C. the articles of confederation were disbanded, the anti-federalists were opposed to ratification, and the bill of rights were aimed at individuals freedom not strengthening the governments power.
Naddik [55]3 years ago
6 0

James Madison (father of the constitution) wrote the bill of right that would be added to the constitution once the Anti-federalists supported ratification.

The bill of right was written by James Madison and the bill lists certain things that the government won’t have power over. Several states called for this amendment in other to cut down government powers and allow freedom for the citizen.

In the first amendment, the founders recognized that individual should have the right to worship freely. Therefore, it remains illegal and unconstitutional for the congress to make laws establishing religion and limiting freedom of speech.  

However, in the fourth amendment, the government does not have any power to search citizen’s homes without obtaining a valid search warrant.

Virginia declaration of right written by Gorge mason greatly influenced the Bill of rights. English document including the English bill of right, the Massachusetts body of liberties, the petition of right were among other precursors that influenced the bill of right.

The controversial points between the federalists, who supported a powerful federal government and the Anti-federalists, who advocated that power should remain in the state and local government was the bill of right that would prevent the government from exercising its powers on certain things.

Although, the federalists were not in support of the bill of rights, they argued that the bill of right would create a barrier that would limit the right of the people instead of protecting them, but the Anti-federalists pushed for the bill of rights. They argued that such bill will protect and safeguard the right of the citizens.

LEARN MORE:

  • Bill of Rights brainly.com/question/706108

KEYWORDS:

  • anti-federalists
  • federalists
  • bill of rights
  • james madison
You might be interested in
Primary sources about colonization of south africa ?
aliina [53]

Answer:

Amsco, Heimlers History, Look up ap world websites online and there are a bunch of teachers who put their resources out in the open.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why did native americans fight for land and water​
Whitepunk [10]

I am sort of confuse becouse this is phrased as one question (at first i thought you where talking about the recent fight about not putting in a pipeline but i relized you said why DID)

So i will split it into 2 Native americans fought for land becouse for one they needed a place to live and second they belived the great spirit wanted them to live where they did

They fought for water to live/drink

6 0
3 years ago
How did nationalist feelings endanger the Austro Hungarian empire? Who has this quick check???
tester [92]
<span>The Austro-Hungarian empire was endangered by feelings of nationalism because there were multiple national groups within the empire. So fulfilling nationalist goals would mean a dividing of the empire. The mere fact that the question refers to the empire as "Austro-Hungarian" is already a strong hint of the issue. Prior to 1867, it had been known as simply the Austrian Empire, but a compromise in 1867 meant that a dual monarchy was recognized (an Austrian ruler and a Hungarian ruler). The Hungarians were given self-governing authority over their own internal affairs in their portion of the empire. Other people groups within the empire would seek their own recognition as well -- Czechs, Serbs, Croats, etc. So where nationalism was a uniting factor in regions like the Italian peninsula and the German territories north of Austria, for the Austrian empire, nationalism was a dividing force.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
When Germany annexed Austria in 1938, the United States responded by
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
List two examples in which George W. Bush used his powers as Commander in Chief
elixir [45]

Answer:

umm  if u copy and paste the question u can find what u need from google

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "After an unequivocal experience of the inefficiency of the subsisting federal government, you are called upon to deliberate on
    5·1 answer
  • After President Nixon’s resignation, who became president of the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • How was nationalism connected to the assassination of the archduke?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the development of agriculture change daily life in the neolithic age?
    8·1 answer
  • The old adage politics stops at the water’s edge means that
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following groups oppose the Civil War
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following helped the Qin Dynasty unite China?
    6·1 answer
  • Who else likes the Genocide?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the longest river in central Asia, and which countries does it border?
    15·1 answer
  • What where the dates for world war one?<br>​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!