The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
I am going to compare the Haitian revolutionary leader Toussaint Louverture with the Father of the Mexican Independence, priest Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla.
Toussaint Louverture (1743-1803) was the most important leader of the Haitian independence movent who had the courage to fight against the powerful French Army. Indeed, due to his courage and dedication to the Haitian people's cause, he is known as the Father of Haiti.
He was a native of the island, at that time, known as Saint-Domininqgue, under the rule of France. He was a slave, could get his freedom, and became a jacobine that supported the revolutionary ideas of freedom and equality. And that is what he wanted for his beloved island.
On the other hand, we have the case of the Mexican priest Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla (1753-1811). He was a "criollo," half Spanish, half Mexican. As the member of the clergy he was, he was against the many injustices suffered by the native Indians and did not like the way the Spanish crown oppressed the Indians. He gathered the support of many people like Josefa Ortiz de Dominguez, José María Morelos y Pavón, and more, to declare the beginning of the Mexican revolutionary movement on September 15, 1810.
Answer:
The record of the Beale treasure story given in Ward's 1885 handout is a main story, and that the treasure in Bed ford Area, Virginia, was covered there by the amazing semi legitimate privateer, Jean Lafitte (Laffite).
I acknowledge that Lafitte had a treasure that he wished to hide.
There is no proof to recommend that Lafitte was keen on ensuring a treasure for his beneficiaries or for the beneficiaries of his men. Normally, he would wish to ensure such a treasure for himself and his family, however that could be taken care of without a requirement for a mind boggling plan to circulate the treasure to a named rundown of beneficiaries. Best case scenario, the treasure story could give a cover to clarify the treasure's birthplace, and hence give it authenticity.
Basically, quite a prepared story could be used as a way to "wash" Lafitte's amassed wealth.
There are even stories that the treasure was not deliberately hidden. A few records state that the treasure was ready one of Lafitte's vessels and sank to the sea floor after a wreck.
Explanation:
All through Lafitte's occasions as a bootlegger and privateer, he turned out to be exceptionally affluent. His treasure comprised of the cash he would get in return for his unfamiliar merchandise just as the treasures left on the vendor delivers that he caught.
It is as yet hazy why Lafitte needed to cover his treasure or even where he was most recently seen. A few antiquarians relate that Lafitte returned to an existence of wrongdoing, leaving the US no decision except for to seek after his capture. With the danger of detainment and the dread of being caught, Lafitte purportedly covered his treasure with the objective to by and by sidestep U.S. seizure and to return to it later.
I think is <span>Farmers began using new equipment, </span><span>The amount of money available to farmers increased </span>
Answer:
Through its prior delimitation of the candidates for Chief Executive, the government of the People's Republic of China limits the right of its citizens to the free election of their representatives. In other words, it previously delimits this right, prohibiting its citizens from choosing candidates who do not belong to the Communist Party, with which their decision-making power is severely limited. This situation directly attacks the concept of democracy, which implies the free and unrestrained election of representatives by the citizens of a country.
Answer:D
Explanation:
The Nation of Islam believed in black nationalism
