I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Answer:
also known as the Transcontinental Treaty, or the Florida Purchase Treaty, was a treaty between America and Spain that took place in 1819 and it ceded the Florida territory to the United States and was considered to define the border between the U.S. and Spain
Explanation:
Spain realized they would not be able to stop America from taking Florida so they decided to instead take a loss from war, sell them the land so that it is a "win-win" for everyone
Answer:
They are rich in protien
Explanation:
I heard this from bear grylls, ask him if any doubt :)
Answer:
Segregation and voting rights were important during the civil rights area because the african americans were not allowed to vote, or do what the whites were able to do. The reason they were important also was so the whites could keep the world how they wanted it to and they new the african americans were probably going to change segregation and all of that.
Explanation:
