Answer:
B. False
Explanation:
The real answer should be bankruptcy.
The elite were wealthy farmers or urban merchants. in the South, they were wealthy planters. Hope this helped love.
The answer to this really depends on what prism you are viewing it from?
As a globe, we are pretty opposed to imperialism these days. China has started to dabble a little more in the South China Sea but we mostly have our nation states and there isn't really a lot of movement.
That was not the case at the time of annexation.
So, is it ethical to subsume a sovereign nation? No
Was it strategically justifiable at the time? Yes. If the United States had not annexed Hawaii, the Empire of Japan likely would have stepped in.
Hawaii has enormous strategic value and was then justifiable at the time of annexation.
That being said, and I hope this is an obvious statement, imperialism is not a good thing and is ethically problematic.
Answer: Propaganda
Explanation:
When Abraham Lincoln said these words, he meant to show that the United States could not continue if the North and the South had differing opinions on slavery and that in the end only one view would stand. Seeing as he was a Republican which was a party opposed to slavery, we know what view he supported.
He therefore used the quote above as propaganda to push forward his views on the division in country.
In "Mahogany Fox," what other important characteristics does the fox demonstrate in the story?
Answer:
The fox is witty and perseveres (doesn't give up)
Explanation:
