It could possible be ironic and problematic because the rest of the world was technically already "discovered", but just not by the Europeans specifically.
Well you would be in a new place so maybe a bit scared about what the new land will consist of. But also a bit excited because you would be making history.
<em>Answer: </em><em>These were the effects of World War I on Germany:</em>
<em />
<em>Many civilians were starving due to naval blockades. (From 1914 to 1919, Germany suffered a naval blockade in the hands of the Allies)</em>
<em>The nation was held responsible for the war and had to pay for other countries' losses. (The Treaty of Versailles stated everything that Germany was blamed for and how they were to repay for the damages)</em>
<em>The nation’s leader went into exile. (Wilhelm II fled to the Netherlands)</em>
<em>These were the effects of World War I on the United States:</em>
<em />
<em>The nation celebrated Armistice Day with the other allies who had won the war.</em>
<em>The nation teamed with others to create the Treaty of Versailles.</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em />
The answer should be on answers.com
The correct answers are: the declaration of independence speaks of a divine creator and the declaration of the rights of man speaks of a supreme being. Both documents drew on the "natural law" philosophy of John Locke.
Indeed, the Declaration of independence explicitly mentions the Creator in the preamble:
“"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen mentions the Supreme being in its preamble as well:
“In consequence whereof, the National Assembly recognises and declares, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following Rights of Man and of the Citizen.”
Finally, although both documents draw on the natural law philosophy of John Locke, the American version is more traditional in that it considers that such rights are given to humans by a deity or transcendent being of the same kind while the French version is more secular.
