<u>Answer:</u>
B) Union troops wanted to strike fear into Confederates by devastating their towns.
C) Union troops sought to destroy resources that Confederate troops needed to fight.
These statements reveal about Union tactics during the Civil War.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Union state tactics to win the civil war was simple, which was aimed to break the resource supply so that the confederate army would become vulnerable and shatter the towns on their way to create fear among the people.
<u>The northern army had 5 major goals-
</u>
1. To block their help from abroad by taking control over the southern coasts.
2. Taking control over the Mississippi river so that it would separate Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas from other Confederate states.
3. To capture Richmond.
4. To shatter the morale of civilians
5. To use the troop size and break the spirit of the confederate army.
The period saw major technological advances, including the adoption of gunpowder, the invention of vertical windmills, spectacles, mechanical clocks, and greatly improved water mills, building techniques (Gothic architecture, medieval castles), and agriculture in general (three-field crop rotation)
SNCC, SCLC, nation of Islam and Black panther play significant role in fighting for civil rights.
<h3>What did SNCC, SCLC, nation of Islam and Black panther?</h3>
Student Nonviolence Coordinating Committee was an organization led by student group that was fighting for African-American civil rights.
The SCLC did demonstrations that played a vital role in the civil rights movement i.e. voting rights.
Human rights in Islam are firmly rooted in the belief that God is the Law Giver and the source of all human rights.
Black panther was a revolutionary organization with an ideology of Black nationalism which was built against police brutality.
So we can conclude that SNCC, SCLC, nation of Islam and Black panther play significant role in fighting for civil rights.
Learn more about civil rights here: brainly.com/question/131269
#SPJ1
(1) Claimed that individual states have the right to interpret federal laws.
