1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kozerog [31]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following statements best describes the results of the Compromise of 1850?

History
2 answers:
zheka24 [161]3 years ago
6 0

The compromise was in strong favor of Southern States.

cupoosta [38]3 years ago
3 0
The correct answer is: <span>The compromise was in strong favor of Southern States.


Hope i helped! have a lovely day♥</span>
You might be interested in
He was a silent film star and was known for his physical comedy. His trademark was a stoic, deadpan expression, earning him the
Vsevolod [243]
Joseph Frank "Buster" Keaton
8 0
3 years ago
The phrases below identify the beliefs of a political party.
Illusion [34]
Democratic Party favors government regulation of the economy and favors high taxes for high income earners.
6 0
3 years ago
How were the british able to conquer india?
melisa1 [442]
There are a good number of reasons why the British were able to do so, and in fact rule over India effectively for over a century.

Disunity among Indian princely states. India was more a collection of warring princely states, at loggerheads with each other. The British sucessfully used this to play off one state against another. Add to it there was no dearth of people willing to betray the kingdom for a few pieces of silver. Robert Clive succeeded at Plassey, because Mir Jaffar was willing to betray his master Siraj-Ud-Daulah in lie of being the Nawab. Mir Jaffar himself was betrayed by Mir Qasim later on.Tipu Sultan one of the most redoubtable fighters against the British rule, was finally defeated, as the Marathas, King of Mysore, Nizam of Hyderabad all joined hands with the British.
Superiority over other colonial powers. The other colonial powers in India competing for the share of resources were France,Portugal,Denmark, Holland. Of the 4, Denmark and Holland could never really be serious competitors to the British, they had their own trading posts, scattered around, but were never a serious threat. Portugal focussed primarily on the Western coast, Goa, parts of Kerala, Karnataka, and this left the British with vast swathes of unoccupied territory. That left France as the major contender to Britian in the race for colonialism. The British Army was more well equipped, more professional, more disciplined compared to the French army, suffering from indiscipline and corruption. This made the British win key battles all over the East Coast, as they effectively grabbed control.
Doctrine of Lapse. One of the most effective tactics, the British used to take over most of India. Instead of waging an all out war against some of the princely states, they signed a treaty with them, where in if the ruling king died without a heir, the East India company could take over that. And that is how Satara became one of the first states to end up under British rule. And that was also the main reason for the conflict in Jhansi.
Subsidiary alliance was also an effective instrument. According to this alliance, the kingdom which signs the treaty will have to maintain the following rules:

The British agreed to maintain a permanent and fixed subsidiary force within the territory of their ally.
In return, they didn't take money but took over a part of the territory of the ally.
A British officer called "resident" was placed at the court of the ruler.{he could interfere in the internal matters of the kingdom}
The ally could not maintain any relation with any other ruler without the approval of the British.{so,when the rulers wanted to revolt against the British they are alone.}
The Indian rulers felt a false sense of security but in reality they were losing their independence. On the other hand the Britishers maintained large forces at the expenses of the Indian rulers and also increase their area of influence. Some states brought under control through this policy are Hyderabad, Tanjore, Awadh, etc.
At the end of it all, the British had the advantage of better manpower, were militarily more powerful and stronger, and add to it they had some very canny strategists too. And the disunity among Indian princely states, their constant warring with each other, just added to the advantage.
3 0
3 years ago
On<br> Add the ones<br> and regroup.<br> 3 4 5<br> + 276<br> Nw<br> Hddhdh
Yuliya22 [10]
Answer:345+276=621.
3 0
3 years ago
6. John Rolfe plants______
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

John Rolfe plants tobacco

whose world market is currently controlled by the Spanish.

Selling seeds to foreigners is punishable by death 7.

Explanation:

Have a great day/night! ^w^

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes how media can shape public policy?
    10·2 answers
  • , Soviet-led organization that sought to defend each other against a possible NATO attack.
    14·2 answers
  • Fossils, like the Mesosaurus found on both Africa and South America and the Glossopteris plant found on several continents, help
    8·2 answers
  • What might be one important consequence of a law that required any slave caught running toward Canada and freedom be returned to
    8·2 answers
  • Select all that apply.
    6·2 answers
  • Dear God, the person reading this is kind and I’m proud of them . Please help them live life to the fullest and bless her in the
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me!
    12·1 answer
  • What was usually the key to winning a battle in the American Revolutionary War?
    8·2 answers
  • Describe how the scientific method drove technological advancement?
    11·1 answer
  • How did President Wilson attempt to gain the public’s support for the League of Nations?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!