Answer:
- Compare sources to analyze their content for historical bias.
- Approach current interpretations of past events as historical fiction.
Explanation:
Though you can distinguished hindsight bias everywhere in human history, the event was first defined and analyzed as such. We might further look at all the positions and secondary aspects and understand that given these variables, it was apparent what was going to follow. Early studies asked individuals annual-classification trivia puzzles or required them to anticipate federal elections; they asked members to evoke their foresight. You might step away from the movie believing that you knew it all along, but the truth is that you plausibly didn't. When a drama approaches its end, and we learn who the killer was, we may look behind on our concept of the movie and misremember our primary impressions of the guilty character.
The absence of a uniform tariff rate benefited British exports to America.
Boliviar had hoped for a unified state in latin america, but instead latin america was divided into Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela
Treaty of Tordesillas had a lot to do in the division of Latin America. Back then, the majority of Latin countries were controlled by Portugal and Spain. In order to make colonization became easier, they divided Latin America into several parts
hope this helps
I would choose thomas Jefferson . Because he was very independent & smart
