Answer:
<em>The boy has a ball. Perhaps he has been keeping it for a long time. He must have developed a lot of attachment and love with the ball but Suddenly while he was playing, the ball bounced down the street. And after a few bounces, it fell down into the harbour. It is lost forever. The boy stands there shocked and fixed to the ground. He constantly goes on staring at the spot where his ball fell down into the water.
Outwardly, the loss seems to be quite small. The boy seems to be making a fuss over the loss. Many boys have lost such balls and will lose so in future. A new ball can be easily bought in a dime. The metaphor of the lost ball is beautifully linked to the loss of sweet childhood.
No amount of money can buy the ball back that has been lost forever. Similarly, no worldly wealth can buy back the lost childhood. The poet doesn’t want to sermonise on this issue. The boy himself has to learn epistemology or the nature of the loss. He has to move ahead in life forgetting all the losses he has suffered in the past.</em>
I also think that they answer is b.
Answer:
Modernism. Structuralism. Deconstruction. Poststructuralism. Postmodernism. Post-colonialism. Hypertexts.
Answer: Caused to be a certain nature
Explanation:
If you replace the word “rendered” with “caused to be” the statement still makes sense. A good rephrasing would be:
The sad cries of the many slaves, horrible yesterday, are made worse by the joyous shouts that they hear.
So he could see what the colonists thought of him and what the effects of his actions were
