1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
3 years ago
10

How did most slaves come to America?

History
2 answers:
vladimir1956 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Hello!


Most slaves come from Africa and are imported on a boat or ship. Then, they would have to be escorted to wherever state they were assigned to and such.


Hope this helps! ~Pooch ♥

mojhsa [17]3 years ago
4 0

The Dutch imported slaves from Asia into their colony in South Africa. In 1807 Britain, which held extensive, although mainly coastal, colonial territories on the African continent (including southern Africa), made the international slave trade illegal, as did the United States in 1808.


You might be interested in
13. What is the MAIN reason John Smith went back to England?
xeze [42]
C. He was injured and had to return back to England to recover he had sustained an injury from a gunpowder explosion
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Break down and explain the role christianity played in spanish colonization and empire building
blagie [28]

Answer:

In the early years of what later became the United States, Christian religious groups played an influential role in each of the British colonies, and most attempted to enforce strict religious observance through both colony governments and local town rules.

Most attempted to enforce strict religious observance. Laws mandated that everyone attend a house of worship and pay taxes that funded the salaries of ministers. Eight of the thirteen British colonies had official, or “established,” churches, and in those colonies dissenters who sought to practice or proselytize a different version of Christianity or a non-Christian faith were sometimes persecuted.

Although most colonists considered themselves Christians, this did not mean that they lived in a culture of religious unity. Instead, differing Christian groups often believed that their own practices and faiths provided unique values that needed protection against those who disagreed, driving a need for rule and regulation.

Explanation:

In Europe, Catholic and Protestant nations often persecuted or forbade each other's religions, and British colonists frequently maintained restrictions against Catholics. In Great Britain, the Protestant Anglican church had split into bitter divisions among traditional Anglicans and the reforming Puritans, contributing to an English civil war in the 1600s. In the British colonies, differences among Puritan and Anglican remained.

Between 1680 and 1760 Anglicanism and Congregationalism, an offshoot of the English Puritan movement, established themselves as the main organized denominations in the majority of the colonies. As the seventeenth and eighteenth century passed on, however, the Protestant wing of Christianity constantly gave birth to new movements, such as the Baptists, Methodists, Quakers, Unitarians and many more, sometimes referred to as “Dissenters.”  In communities where one existing faith was dominant, new congregations were often seen as unfaithful troublemakers who were upsetting the social order.

Despite the effort to govern society on Christian (and more specifically Protestant) principles, the first decades of colonial era in most colonies were marked by irregular religious practices, minimal communication between remote settlers, and a population of “Murtherers, Theeves, Adulterers, [and] idle persons.” An ordinary Anglican American parish stretched between 60 and 100 miles, and was often very sparsely populated. In some areas, women accounted for no more than a quarter of the population, and given the relatively small number of conventional households and the chronic shortage of clergymen, religious life was haphazard and irregular for most. Even in Boston, which was more highly populated and dominated by the Congregational Church, one inhabitant complained in 1632 that the “fellows which keepe hogges all weeke preach on the Sabboth.”

Christianity was further complicated by the widespread practice of astrology, alchemy and forms of witchcraft. The fear of such practices can be gauged by the famous trials held in Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692 and 1693. Surprisingly, alchemy and other magical practices were not altogether divorced from Christianity in the minds of many “natural philosophers” (the precursors of scientists), who sometimes thought of them as experiments that could unlock the secrets of Scripture. As we might expect, established clergy discouraged these explorations.

In turn, as the colonies became more settled, the influence of the clergy and their churches grew. At the heart of most communities was the church; at the heart of the calendar was the Sabbath—a period of intense religious and “secular” activity that lasted all day long. After years of struggles to impose discipline and uniformity on Sundays, the selectmen of Boston at last were able to “parade the street and oblige everyone to go to Church . . . on pain of being put in Stokes or otherwise confined,” one observer wrote in 1768. By then, few communities openly tolerated travel, drinking, gambling, or blood sports on the Sabbath.

5 0
3 years ago
Do you think music can actually encourage lawlessness, violence, or immorality? explain
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

Yes, I legit just wrote a whole paper on this!

Explanation:

Many adolescents enjoy listening to sad lyrics after breakups, or aggressive music when they feel angry. Yet when one listens to such music, they must take into account the severe impact it may have on both their psychological and emotional well-being. Aristotle once said “Music directly imitates the passions or states of the soul; hence, when one listens to music that imitates certain passion, he becomes imbued with the same passion,” followed by, “...if one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person; but, conversely, if he listens to the right kind of music, he will tend to become the right kind of person.”  Is there truth behind what this wise man once said so long ago? Research has shown that the music one listens to may impact their behavior, memory retention, and overall emotional health.  

First of all, it is worth considering that when one repetitively listens to songs containing negative messages, the listener could become more prone to high anxiety levels, aggressive behaviors, and suicidal thoughts. Teenagers typically undergo a boundless range of emotional highs and lows daily, and many use music to express said emotions. With balance, most forms of music are acceptable as outlets to release a wide range of repressed feelings. However, during adolescence, teens are highly impressionable and emotional because their minds are still developing. Excessive exposure to negative messages can cause the listener to ruminate on negative thoughts and, in some cases, affect the nervous system and dysregulate some of the body’s natural rhythms (Taylor). In fact, studies have revealed that enough exposure to disharmonic music or songs with violent and immoral themes can induce aggressive and negative thoughts, thus increasing the likelihood of negative behavior (Avramova).  Music with lyrics depicting negative behaviors could even become a stumbling block to listeners who may have had a previous history with such actions or influence them to think about negative actions, and potentially lead them to take part in those improper acts. Not only that, but music may also have the ability to impact relationships negatively. Worldly lyrics are often full of profanity and are overtly sexualized. They tend to present romantic relationships as something that is chiefly physical. Such music could potentially alter the listeners’ idea of what relationships should look like, consequently leading to toxic relationships (Herron).

7 0
3 years ago
Which group in the south was least likely to prosper after the war?
Ganezh [65]

Answer:

The Sharecroppers farmers in the south will like not prosper after the war.

Explanation:

The Sharecroppers are farmers in the south. They are farmers who engage in giving out land as rent to large farmers who engage in plantation farming; the farmers in return give them part of their produce as compensation for the land rented.

However, they are the least like to proper after the war because most of the head of families of all these sharecroppers have been killed during the war with lots of diseases infections.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is Cajun culture disappearing?!
GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

Cajun French (spoken by Cajuns and Creoles, mainly in Louisiana) is in danger of disappearing because of the overwhelming dominance of American English. Younger people are much less likely than their elders to speak Cajun.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Communist targets for an eventual takeover includes all of the following expect
    8·1 answer
  • What was king philips war?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did William Tecumseh Sherman travel to West Texas in 1871
    6·1 answer
  • Louis philippe became citizen king of france after which monarch was forced to flee the july revolution of 1830?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following can be attributed to environmental conditions in Asia during the period between 1200 and 1450 CE? q9
    14·1 answer
  • During World War II, the tide turned in favor of the United States at the Battle of
    6·1 answer
  • Describe the differences between the government's early "civilization" and assimilation policies and its later
    12·1 answer
  • Europeans' belief in their cultural superiority helped them justify imperialistic actions because they thought?
    14·2 answers
  • .
    9·1 answer
  • The government which replaced the tsar had to share power with the ____.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!