Wanted to unite all of South America into a single nation--> Simon Bolivar
Led a large group of American Indians and Mestizos against the Spanish--> Padre Miguel Hidalgo
Defeated Napoleons army to win independence from France--> Toussaint L'Ouverture
Supported Brazil's independence after Portugal was invaded by France--> Dom Pedro
These leaders were responsible for gaining the independence of their countries and/or regions from European colonial leaders. Bolivar liberated South America from Spain and Hidalgo did so for Mexico as well. L'Ourverture led the revolution in Haiti against the French. Pedro supported the only bloodless revolution in Brazil from the Portuguese. All of these movements occurred in the early 1800's which almost entirely ended 300 years of colonization in the Americas
Answer:
The Union originally wanted to reunite the country, but after the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, the Union goal changed to include the abolition of slavery. The Confederacy had the same goal throughout the war: to incorporate all slave states and secede from the Union, survive, and defend its territory.
Explanation:
please mark this answer as brainliest
There were several features that helped industries grow quickly in the country after the Civil War. There was massive influx of immigrants and so there was no dearth of labor force. Also there was great improvement regarding new inventions and technological advancements. There was also great availability of raw materials like timber, oil etc.
Option A. The strategies that the Native American civil rights used to call attention to their cause are: They occupied federal land and the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
<h3>What was the Native American civil rights movement?</h3>
The AIM movement was a movement that was started by the Native Americans as they protested their plight in America.
They were living in poverty, had no jobs and faced discrimination and police brutality in America.
Read more on the civil rights movement here:
brainly.com/question/8852160
#SPJ1
According to Aristotle, man by nature is a political animal, this can be justified by Russian invasion of Ukraine which is a s a result of both social and political conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
<h3>What is the meaning of
political animal by Aristotle?</h3>
Man is by nature a political animal by Aristotle means that man is destined by his own nature to dwell as a sociopolitical being.
Looking into the Russian invasion of Ukraine, we can see it was caused as a result of Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine.
Learn more about Aristotle on:
brainly.com/question/24994054
#SPJ1