Answer:
The sociometric/peer acceptance category of controversial relates to children who are noticed by peers and are liked by a quite a few children and disliked by quite a few others.
Explanation:
<u>A sociometric status is a measurement that shows how liked or disliked children are by their peers.</u> It can be divided into five categories: popular, rejected, neglected, average, or controversial. <u>The controversial category is the one that answers our question. It refers to children who are liked by quite a few children and disliked by quite a few others. Children who belong to this category have qualities that can be perceived as good or bad by others.</u> For instance, they tend to be prone to anger, and may seem a bit snobbish. On the other hand, they can also be sociable, cooperative, and good at sports.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
okay give me your socials
Explanation:
thank you
Alexis de tocqueville referred to the ability of the majority in a democracy to impose its will on everyone else as <u>"the tyranny of the majority".</u>
The idea of the tyranny of the majority was advanced by the nineteenth century political scholars Alexis de Tocqueville (Democracy in America) and John Stuart Mill (On Liberty). It alludes to a circumstance in which the greater part implements its will on a distraught minority through the equitable procedure. That is the thing that various minority bunches in the UK are encountering after Leave won the submission. Unexpectedly, this result has hurt the interests of the minority, as well as that of the dominant part that bolstered Brexit.
