Storage temperatures higher than 100 degrees F may shorten the shelf life of canned goods.
- Canned nourishments are the foremost conspicuously utilized stuffed nourishment all over the world.
- We will see the canned nourishment in each house hold. Individuals utilize them since they are simple to be kept up & require less time to be cooked.
- Temperatures over 100 degrees Fahrenheit are hurtful for canned nourishments.
- On the off chance that the capacity temperature rises, the hazard of deterioration of nourishment bounced strongly.
- There are tall chances of loosing supplement of the caned nourishment, in the event that put away at over 75 degree for exceptionally long period.
- Within the glass containers the light can cause color changes and supplement misfortunes in nourishments.
- That’s why we are exhorted to utilize the more seasoned canned nourishment prior than the more up to date one i.e. we ought to take after the method of LIFO (final in to begin with out).
To know more about "Canned goods"
https://brainly.in/question/21368060
#SPJ4
Greek philosophy is what Aristotle taught
A totaliterian dictatorship is a autocracy because a autocratic government usually has a dictator
Answer:
Repressive regimes would try to maintain an absolute power over the society it ruled over.
Explanation:
- A repressive government is the one form of government which always restricts or forbid people's freedom and control their life by using state force. Under repressive government freedom of speech is banned, Media is controlled by the regime, No political opposition and even No civil society are allowed to work.
- Under repressive regimes, it can not be allowed the people to freely express their opinion against the regime and if they do so it is seen as Illegal or against the state authority and it is a punishable offense.
- Civil society is banned in the repressive regime because repressive like to operate alone and they do not want to share their authority with any other or especially with Civil society which can later speak against the Ill practices of the regime.
Answer: A case that had to do with contract interference. Pennzoil made an unsolicited bid to buy 20 percent of Getty Oil at $112.50 per share and the Getty Board approved the agreement. Before the lawyers for both side could approve the agreement, Texaco appeared and offered Getty stockholders $128 a share for the entire company. Getty officers turned their attention to Texaco, but Pennzoil sued, claiming tortious interference. Texaco said they had not interfered because there was no binding contract.
Jury agreed with Penzoil's argument--$7.53 million in actual damages and $3 billion more in punitive damages. After appeals and frantic negotiations, the two parties reached a settlement.
Texaco agreed to pay Penzoil $3 billion as a settlement for having wrongfully interfered with Pennzoil's agreement to buy Getty.
