Many historians believe only cultural changes such as war, trade or rebellion affect the course of history and that people can always adapt to climate change. In the case of the Mayans, it is generally assumed they were destroyed by invaders. Gill's work challenges this.
Translaccion
Muchos historiadores creen que solo los cambios culturales como la guerra, el comercio o la rebelión afectan el curso de la historia y que las personas siempre pueden adaptarse al cambio climático. En el caso de los mayas, generalmente se supone que fueron destruidos por los invasores. El trabajo de Gill desafía esto. Muchos historiadores creen que solo los cambios culturales como la guerra, el comercio o la rebelión afectan el curso de la historia y que las personas siempre pueden adaptarse al cambio climático. En el caso de los mayas, generalmente se supone que fueron destruidos por los invasores. El trabajo de Gill desafía esto.
Answer:
The New Jewel Movement (NJM) under the leadership of Maurice Bishop was the main opposition party in Grenada during the 1970s. In 1979, the NJM overthrew the government of Eric Gairy, which had ruled the country since independence in 1974. The NJM launched an armed takeover of the radio station, police barracks, and various other key locations in Grenada while Gairy was on a trip outside the country. The armed takeover was conducted by the National Liberation Army (NLA), which had been formed in 1973 as the military wing of the NJM.
The NJM suspended the constitution and announced new laws. Maurice Bishop announced the formation of the PRG over radio, which organized a cabinet to run the country with Bishop as prime minister. All political organizations except for the NJM were banned, and membership in the NJM was thereafter tightly controlled.
After the executions, a new government called the Revolutionary Military Council, led by General Hudson Austin, was formed to rule the country and the PRG ceased to exist. This government nominally ruled for six days before being ousted by the United States invasion of Grenada.
The PRG enjoyed widespread support under Maurice Bishop according to a report on a survey shortly after the United States invasion, "some 73.8 percent of the respondents stated that they felt that the PRG had very good support." This support plummeted after the assassination of Bishop.
Explanation:
I hope this helps
The aftermath of the Great Schism was far-reaching. By far the most obvious consequence of the schism was the establishment of canonical division between the Western Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches.
As demonstrated in the Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople in 1204, tensions between Western and Eastern Christians further escalated after the split. This schism established the unique identities of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a major effect of the Great Schism on modern life?</h3>
Generally, The Great Schism had a variety of repercussions as a result. The most obvious and obvious consequence of the split was the official separation of the Eastern Orthodox churches and the Western Catholic churches. This was a significant impact of the schism.
In conclusion, As a result of the split, tensions between Western Christians and Eastern Christians escalated, as seen by events such as the Fourth Crusade and the sacking of Constantinople in 1204. Because of this schism, the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church have always been able to differentiate themselves from one another.
Read more about Great Schism
brainly.com/question/1461104
#SPJ1
Based on what i know he thought the bank was the monster. hope this helps
Copernicus Kelper and Newton had a lot of the same ideologies and alot of the same ideas in general
