Thank you for posting you question here at brainly. Among the choices provided I believed the answer should be <span>allusion to something with which the audience would have been familiar.
I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more question here. </span>
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
<u>B. After feeling horrible for a week, the woman with a fever and a severe cough finally decided to see a doctor.</u>
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
A. This is wrong because it says she "finally decided to see with a fever and a severe cough a doctor." This does not make sense.
<u>B. This is right because it clearly states that the woman had the symptoms.</u>
C. It says that the woman "decided to see a doctor with a fever and a severe cough." LOL.
D. This one also is talking about the soman decided to see a doctor who is sick. LOLOLOLOLOLOL.
First of all, jargon aphasia is always related to damage in the temporal lobe (particularly, in the Wernicke's area).
Now, given that the interviewed's speech presents nonwords like "bick", "chpickters" or "carfter", it is most likely that they were dealing with a neologistic aphasia, this is, <u>no phonological relatedness to actual words </u>that would reach the meaning intended by the speaker, but would resemble, at least phonetically, to others contained within the linguistic community.
Plywood: a wood that folds over itself
Implicit: not obvious. folded into words.
That is a run on sentence. 'These fences kept cattle in and rustlers out. Cattle injured themselves on the feces at first.'
