I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
Answer:
I just won a brand new car!
Explanation:
Winning a brand new car would give feelings of excitement
The correct answer is A. He begins to consider illogical possibilities
Explanation:
"Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" is a novel written by Robert Louis Stevenson, in this novel John Utterson is trying to understand the strange events that occur to Dr. Jekyll a friend of him who has found a way to change his body and personality and became Mr. Hyde which is an evil and mysterious character. In these excerpts, Dr. Jekyll's servant Poole who has also notice strange events and believes Mr. Hyde has killed Dr. Jekyll looks for the help of Utterson as Mr. Hyde is the room of Dr. Jekyll and after they both entered the room they find the body of Mr. Hyde and a letter of Dr. Jekyll, from this situation Utterson starts reflecting on possible explanations the first one is that Mr. Hyde could not have killed Jekyll because the possible murder did not scape and does not seem to be logical, also, he believes there was no reason for Hyde to kill Jekyll and the letter found from Jekyll shows he is alive, this actions imply Utterson does not understand the situation and starts thinking on non logical theories to try to give an explanation. Thus, in these excerpts, Utterson begins to consider illogical possibilities as the events are too strange and he is trying to understand them.
"A Genetics of Justice" by Julia Alvarez is a story of a totalitarian government and a young girl. "Trujillo's vanity knew no bounds," provides the best evidence for the central idea. Thus, option B is correct.
<h3>What is the central idea?</h3>
A central idea is the theme of the literary work that gives the insight and the idea of the whole passage or the poem. It deduces the main points and the concept the writer wants the readers to understand.
The statement depicts how Trujillo was worried and concerned about his appearance which led him to build the high heels, Napoleonic hats, etc. that made him look good and hence supports the theme.
Therefore, option B. Trujillo's vanity knew no bounds is the best evidence.
Learn more about the central idea here:
brainly.com/question/16321889
#SPJ1
