Prohibiting the export of arms, ammunition, and implements of war, from the United States to foreign nations at war
Well they should and shouldn't
.im saying this because if they only prioritize on doing environmental things then that new country will fail almost immediately.due to not having a stable government which will intern cause it to be like an every man for them self's type of situation.
But on the other hand if they dont only go after there government issues then there natural resources will run out causing starvation,low birth and death rate,etc. intern causing in a short amount of time it to become like a third world country and be barely scrapping bye.
hope this was what your question is looking for and its helps u in multiple ways! .^_^.
-Harley <3
It was absolutely horrible
If you are talking about the 1917 one, then what happened is that monarchy rule ended since the soviets, that is the Bolsheviks, took over the government and executed the royalty, declaring the party of the people as the only one who is allowed to rule the country since it represented the will of the people. The soviet union was established this way.
A few weaknesses from the articles of confederation were...
- Congress had no power to take/collect taxes
- There was no branch or system to make sure laws were being carried out
- Lots of debts were made that couldn't be paid
- Too many currencies were made and not just 1 currency for the country.
I only listed a <u>few</u> there are plenty more weaknesses.
