Not only is it the purchase of about 40% of America, it also helped grounds to on-go our advancement as a civilization.
Answer:
First, all three movements gained popularity with the middle classes. Second, All three movements were a product of the urban, rural divide in America. Third, all three movements had racial elements. The Temperance Movement grew out of the Second Great Awakening religious revival, as did Abolition. Temperance in the early 1800s transitioned from reduction of use of hard spirits to total abstinence. This reform movement was resisted by recent urban immigrant groups from Ireland and Germany because it ran counter to their cultural experience much as prohibition in the 20th century ran counter to the cultural experience of Southern and Eastern European immigrants. It was thought that drink was the cause of all evils in urban life. As in the other movements there was a racist component not far underneath the avowed purpose. The Health Reform Movement also focused on middle class fears of diseases like cholera and yellow fever emanating from garbage and filth in slums inhabited by recent immigrants. The movement had some basis in science as it advocated cleaning slum areas and providing clean water to slums as a city government service. Again the racist assumption was that immigrants woul not clean their own residential areas without public action. At the time the middle class paid private companies to carry away trash and cart in clean water for their use. The fear of cholera prompted health reform. Phrenology was a pseudo science claiming that. The shape of the head determined characteristics of the individual. It was later used by racists to support bogus theories of racial inferiority. So these movements aided Antebellum Americans in defining cultural norms and maintaining the status quo regarding racial hierarchies.
Explanation:
It allowed them fewer ships than the US and Britain limiting the kind of parity they hoped to have on the world stage in terms of naval power.
One of the arguments went that the US and Britain had to have larger navies because of their need to maintain a force in more than one operating theater while the Japanese only had to worry about their side of the Pacific. It wasn't something that made a number of hardcore military types within the Japanese leadership very happy, but they ended up signing the treaty anyway (though refused to renew it in the 1930s).
Your answer is B.
hope this helps.
