Answer:
I think B...not sure
Explanation:
Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial. It sought to prevent the king from exploiting his power, and placed limits of royal authority by establishing law as a power in itself.
Answer:
The two social classes of ancient Rome were made up of patricians and plebeians.
Explanation:
Patricians were the upper class of Ancient Rome. They claimed to be descendants of the families who founded Rome or who settled there shortly after it was founded. As a consequence of their antiquity in the Roman nation, as well as their status of being original from Rome and not from conquered or annexed peoples, the Patricians originally held most of the political and economic power in Ancient Rome. Thus, they practically controlled to their pleasure the decisions of the Senate, and they handled the appointments of the consuls and other positions of power. This was so until the outbreak of the Patrician-Plebeian War, which ended up granting equality to both social classes through Lex Hortensia in 287 BC.
For their part, the Plebeians were Roman citizens who had civil rights under Roman law, but who had no political power or strategic economic importance. Some of them owned land, inherited from their ancestors, but had no greater wealth than some businesses. They were the lowest free class in Ancient Rome, only above slaves and free non-citizens.
relative deprivation theory
In the case of the French Revolution, it would also be good to note the role of relative deprivation in regard to the bourgeoisie, who were also instrumental in starting the Revolution. The bourgeoisie had been gaining wealth through trades and commerce, but were denied the same political status as the nobility. Nobles enjoyed tax exemptions and had political influence, while the bourgeoisie were still considered "commoners" of the 3rd Estate whose social rank was the same as peasants. They saw themselves as being as wealthy (some more so) than nobles, and as being equally as intelligent and valuable (if not more so) ... and so were spurred to revolution to gain the political advantages that they saw the nobility enjoying.
Answer:
Well, Eisenhower was Hell-Bent on War, just looking at his uniform was proving my point, and lets say that FDR was trying to prevent America from entering World War 2 . . . So those are two examples. : )
Explanation: