Answer: fundamental attribution error
Explanation:
Fundamental attributional errors as a result of judging someone actions based on their past behavior or the person's disposition rather than on the situation that they are in.
An example of fundamental attribution error is in marriages, where a wife assumes her husband is angry with her as he usually is, rather than considering if he had a bad day at work.
The net present value is 12,100. The investment should be made because NPV is positive
The present value of an investment's after-tax cash flows is known as the investment's net present value.
Businesses can make decisions using the NPV technique. It aids in not only comparing projects of the same size but also in determining whether a given investment is profitable or not.
While the net present value has advantages such as taking time worth of money into an account and assisting management in making better decisions, it also has drawbacks such as not taking hidden costs into account and being unable to be utilized by the company to compare projects of various sizes.
NPV =( Net annual cash flows x present value factor) - cost
NPV = (44,000 x 5,02 ) - $208,780 = 12,100
To know more about net present value refer to: brainly.com/question/17162144
#SPJ1
Answer: 0.82466
Explanation:
You did not give the other information required to solve the question but here are some information that was gottten.
Portfolio Weight
HCE Corp = 0.25
Green Miget = 0.31
Alive and Well = 0.44
Volatility
HCE Corp = 10%
Green Miget = 27%
Alive and Well = 14%
Correlation with the Market Portfolio
HCE Corp = 0.43
Green Miget = 0.54
Alive and Well = 0.43
Beta of HCE Corp = (0.43 × 0.10)/0.10
= 0.43
Beta of Green Miget = (0.54 × 0.27)/0.10
= 1.458
Beta of Alive and Well
= (0.43 × 0.14 ) /0.10
= 0.602
The beta of the portfolio will then be calculated as the portfolio Weight multiplied by the beta of very stick and this will be
= (0.25 × 0.43) + (0.31 × 1.458) + (0.44 × 0.602)
= 0.1075 + 0.45198 + 0.26488
= 0.82436
Suppose the equilibrium aggregate price level and the equilibrium level of real GDP are both rising. This is probably the effect of a increase in aggregate demand.
<h3>What is
aggregate demand?</h3>
The entire demand for these products and services during the given time period is represented by aggregate demand. Because aggregate demand and gross domestic product (GDP) are determined in the same way, they eventually balance each other out. As a result, changes in aggregate demand and GDP are correlated.
The relationship between the price level and all of the expenditure that individuals, businesses, the government, and other nations are willing to make at each price level is represented graphically by aggregate demand. That should sound familiar if it does. The elements that make up aggregate demand are the same elements that make up real GDP when utilizing the expenditures method:
- Consumption
- Investments
- Federal spending
- Gross exports
Hence, when both the equilibrium level of real GDP and the equilibrium level of aggregate prices are increasing. This is most likely the result of rising aggregate demand.
To know more about aggregate demand refer to: brainly.com/question/3331860
#SPJ4
Using the same cutting board for raw chicken and raw beef is cross - contamination. cross- contamination is t<span>he process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect.</span>
