1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nataly862011 [7]
4 years ago
12

How did the response to the Berlin blockade affect the relationship between the United States and its allies? It harmed their re

lationship because not everyone wanted to oppose the USSR or support airlifting supplies. It harmed their relationship because some nations wanted to take all of the credit and deny the others’ participation. It improved their relationship because it showed that they could earn huge profits by negotiating trade agreements together. It improved their relationship because it showed that they could work together successfully to resist the USSR.
History
2 answers:
Aliun [14]4 years ago
6 0
The answer would be the last one(D)!! Hope this helps :) Have an amazing day! 

Serggg [28]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It improved their relationship because it showed that they could work together successfully to resist the USSR.

Explanation:

The Brooklyn Blockade joined the United States and its Allies against the Soviet Union. The United States and the Soviet Union now Russia for quite a while.  

The Berlin Blockade was an endeavor in 1948 by the Soviet Union to constrain the capacity of France, Great Britain, and the United States to make a trip to their parts of Berlin, which lay inside Russian-involved East Germany. In the long run, the western forces founded a transport that kept going about a year and conveyed truly necessary supplies and alleviation to West Berlin. Coming only three years after the finish of World War II, the bar was the primary significant conflict of the Cold War and foreshadowed future conflict over Berlin.

You might be interested in
What did US intervention in the Middle East have in common with US intervention in Latin America?
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

B) Both interventions were about stopping communism.

Explanation:

I just took the test sis.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was a major difference between social reformers and socialists in the 18th and 19th centuries?
Vadim26 [7]

The major difference between social reformers and socialists in the 18th and 19th centuries was that the socialist were more interested in drastic political and social reorganization.

<h3>Who are social reformers and socialists?</h3>

The social reformers are advocates that advocates for a social reform while a socialists are advocator for the social ownership of the means of production and services.

However, their differences was that the socialist were more interested in drastic political and social reorganization in the 18th and 19th century.

Read more about  social reformers

<em>brainly.com/question/4087856</em>

#SPJ1

6 0
3 years ago
The northern tribes that broke away from Jerusalem founded a separate
juin [17]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

According to the bible there the tribe of Israel broke away into 2 parts, Israel in the north and Judah in the south.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the value of sensor technology for storing crops.<br> It is for science.
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

Sensors that measure a variety of essential soil properties on the go are being developed. These sensors can be used either to control variable rate application equipment in real-time or in conjunction with a Global Positioning System (GPS) to generate field maps of particular soil properties. Depending on the spacing between passes, travel speed, and sampling and/or measurement frequency, the number of measurement points per acre varies; however, in most cases, it is much greater than the density of manual grid sampling. The cost of mapping usually is reduced as well.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In asking congress to declare war , Wilson said , the world must be made safe for democracy . This statement suggest that Wilson
DedPeter [7]
He wanted to go to war to eliminate communist threats. This way democracy would prevail. That is that he meant by safe for democracy.
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • From what hitler's says and what you have learned about World War 1, what was the air of allied propaganda? Why does hitler beli
    8·1 answer
  • What was the role of the mali empire in the eurasian trade network? how did mansa musa influence its development?
    11·1 answer
  • The Bill of Rights is intended to protect individual freedoms and the __________.
    11·2 answers
  • What happened to the number of births in the two years prior to 1946?
    12·1 answer
  • What did the west offer new settlers
    5·2 answers
  • 2There came a great rattling of chains and bolts, and the door was cautiously opened. The man was a stooping, narrow-shouldered,
    15·1 answer
  • Which is true about the battle of the Spanish Armada?
    14·2 answers
  • How were early humans Marginal and disadvantaged among animals at first?
    9·1 answer
  • HELP I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIST
    7·2 answers
  • Check out the image ​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!