1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jonny [76]
3 years ago
15

What are the pros and cons associated with lobbying?​

History
1 answer:
Eva8 [605]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Pros: it allows for interest group who represent a small group of people to have a say in legislation with enough funds.

It allows politicians become aware of certain issues with small groups of people within their region which they represent.

It can be free to participate for the individual in an interest group, or a small yearly fee.

Cons: Based on the needs of the minority party, since the majority does not need more votes to pass legislation, they technically do not need lobbyists.

It can only be effective for specific groups, lobbying costs money, the more resources the more lobbying power you have.

Lobbying is considered nearly borderline illegal by most, since sometimes interest groups make donations to a politicians campaign

You might be interested in
The lack of unity created by the articles of confederation resulted in conflicts between the states
Aleonysh [2.5K]
It was because they didn't have the bill of rights, like they were used to in the Magna Carta when they were apart of the English colonies.
6 0
3 years ago
Was jamestown a success or failure
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

Both, technically

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When did alexander finally realize his fathers dream of conquering the persian empire?
NikAS [45]
C. When he defeated king Darius 3rd of persia
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was Lenin a hero who made life better for Russians or was he a villain who made it worse? Give reasons for your answer.
arlik [135]

Answer:

no he wasnt

Sure he removes the Royalty and all, but he never manages to do better in the ruling. He was power crazy, he kill those who disagree with him and use people to maintain his power, and all his promise for prosperity never achieved in his lives. Heck, he actually loses his first election and calls it void. He was a tyrannical ruler that are only slightly better than the old royalty, and better than Stalin who came after him.

He is not exactly the best example of a hero is. He is more of an idealist, and not cut out as a ruler, and he should never have come into power. Maybe as revolutioner, he is good and all but the person who should come into power should have been someone else.

8 0
2 years ago
When was the Han Dynasty founded
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

202 BCE

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who, north or the south, was most responsible for “killing” reconstruction?
    11·1 answer
  • Why were the civil rights act of 1964 and the voting rights act of 1965 important?
    5·1 answer
  • 6. How did the Constitution set up the legislative branch?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following documents, passed at the Stamp Act Congress, prohibited the purchase of English-made goods in the colonie
    7·1 answer
  • Chasing lincoln killer who wanted a peace of loncoln hair
    14·2 answers
  • Which exploration did King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain sponsor? Bartolomeu Dias’s voyage around the Cape of Good Hope.
    12·2 answers
  • What is the difference between the Vietcong and the Vietminh?
    14·2 answers
  • What event is being explained in this section
    9·1 answer
  • Who was a perpetrator in the film "the pianist" and how ?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Catholic Church's political and economic power help lead to the
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!