1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jonny [76]
4 years ago
15

What are the pros and cons associated with lobbying?​

History
1 answer:
Eva8 [605]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Pros: it allows for interest group who represent a small group of people to have a say in legislation with enough funds.

It allows politicians become aware of certain issues with small groups of people within their region which they represent.

It can be free to participate for the individual in an interest group, or a small yearly fee.

Cons: Based on the needs of the minority party, since the majority does not need more votes to pass legislation, they technically do not need lobbyists.

It can only be effective for specific groups, lobbying costs money, the more resources the more lobbying power you have.

Lobbying is considered nearly borderline illegal by most, since sometimes interest groups make donations to a politicians campaign

You might be interested in
This tall stone Mayan sculpture of a king is known as a
V125BC [204]
Maya stelae is the name of the sculpture.
3 0
3 years ago
i need some topics to talk about for the oregon trail (for example: hardships, benefits, dangers, landmarks)
Alexxx [7]
I’m, sicknesses battled, stops??
7 0
3 years ago
Popular sovereignty was a policy stating that A. voters in a state should decide whether or not to stay in the union. B. voters
nasty-shy [4]
<span>Hello! Popular Sovereignty was a policy that stated that the power to decide about the slavery question was concentred in the hands of the states, and not in the Congress rulers. So, in that way, the answer is b) voters in a territory should decide whether or not to allow slavery in that territory.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Before it was part of the Ottoman Empire, Constantinople was part of the Roman Empire.
guapka [62]
True
Constantinople was a historic Roman city
6 0
3 years ago
What is the main idea of the quote above as it relates to limited and unlimited governments?
boyakko [2]

Answer:

C.

Unlimited governments will inherently be corrupt governments.

(Could I get Brainliest pls?)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the early 1800’s who was most likely to oppose protective tariffs
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Dawes act (1887) mark a departure from earlier federal Indian
    8·1 answer
  • Explain in your own words gender bias
    5·1 answer
  • How did Rome's location near Mediterranean Sea contribute to it's growth​
    10·1 answer
  • How does this experct reflect a significant turning point in american history
    15·1 answer
  • Louis xiv's statement "i am the state", is a reflection of which type of government
    15·1 answer
  • Why did Canada declare independence from Britain
    6·2 answers
  • MMNJNLNLKNMLKNLKKLNKL
    5·2 answers
  • 1. Why did isolationism disappear overnight?
    13·1 answer
  • Please help
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!