Answer:
Explanation:
Taking Country B as a comparison to the United States,
Country B -
1 barrel of oil = 7 hrs
1 ton of coal = 3 hrs
U.S. -
1 barrel of oil = 4 hrs
1 ton of coal = 5 hrs
Country B has the comparative advantage in coal production over US because it takes less time to produce 1 ton of coal. The opposite is true for oil production as US takes less time for 1 barrel of oil.
Availability and use of a natural resource give a country an advantage over another that does not. It takes less time with easily accessible national resource to produce something; such as oil and coal.
Yes I think America had to show that we don't hide in a corner if someone attacks us, we fight back, and it worked
They are part of the legislative branch.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The Enlightenment challenged the traditional authority of the Church.
Explanation:
Education in illustration was the development of educational systems in Europe that continued throughout the period of the Enlightenment and in the French Revolution. The Age of Enlightenment dominated advanced thinking in Europe from the 1650s to the 1780s. It developed from a series of sources of "new" ideas, such as challenges to the dogma and authority of the Catholic Church and by the growing interest in the ideas of science, in scientific methods. In philosophy, he questioned traditional ways of thinking. Enlightenment thinkers wanted to modernize the education system and play a more central role in transmitting these ideas and ideals. The improvements in educational systems produced a greater reading audience, which resulted in a greater demand for readers' printed material across a broad spectrum of social classes with a wider range of interests. After 1800, when the Enlightenment gave way to Romanticism, there was less emphasis on reason and defiance of authority and more support for emerging nationalism and compulsory school attendance.
The correct answer is it protected freedom of speech from state infringement.
This ruling focused on the 14th amendment, which deals with the equal protection clause. This clause ensures that all constitutional rights and federal laws are applied to citizens equally. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that this equal protection of the law includes freedom of speech. This means that state governments can not abuse their power and silence citizens unless there is a clear and present danger.
