As a civilization develops, government is needed to balance any decisions, religion, and/or way of life. Without a central government, a civilization is most likely split into separate groups to survive, whereas with a government everyone can work and fight together. I hope this helps :D
Answer:
The answer is (b-)False.
Explanation:
<u>The United States never attempted to disengage from world affairs and embrace isolationism</u>, but quite the opposite. Even before World War II ended, the US took a leading role in shaping the postwar world, especially through the conferences of Teheran in 1943, Yalta and Potsdam in 1945 that brought "The Big Three" together (Franklin. D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill and Iosif Stalin). The United States was also a founding member of the United Nations in 1945, and was designated as one of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council.
During the ensuing decades, the abolitionist movement grew in Northern states, and Congress regulated the expansion of slavery as new states were admitted to the Union. Britain banned the importation of African slaves in its colonies in 1807 and abolished slavery in the British Empire in 1833.
<span>One major difference was the locations. Meroe was built on the bottom of mountains and thus had a steady amount of rainfall, due to which the soil was fertile. Other cities in Egypt depended on the annual flooding of the Nile River in order to have good soil to plant and grow food needed for survival. This kind of flooding was really important and hence Meroe was important.</span>
The correct answer is Ravenna.
That is because Ravenna was a city that was reconquered by the Byzantine empire after it originally fell to the Ostrogoth when the fall of the Western Roman Empire occurred. It was a capital for western Romans and for the Ostrogoth, but it wasn't for the Byzantine people who had their own capitol even after they reconquered it.
