1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
3 years ago
6

According to Lincoln in his day did most people (a)work for others (b) work for themselves or (c) hire laborers to work for them

? does Lincoln think this was different in the southern slaveholding states than in the northern free states?
History
2 answers:
notsponge [240]3 years ago
8 0

According to the former president Abraham Lincoln, "A large majority belong to neither class – neither work for others, nor have others working for them". Which means that the correct answer is:


(B) work for themselves


Lincoln believed it was no different in Slave States, as he points out himself:

<em>"Even in all our slave States except South Carolina, a majority of the whole people of all colors are neither slaves nor masters"</em>

Setler79 [48]3 years ago
3 0
B) Work for other. Sometimes people do it their selves but most of the time people work for others for quick money

You might be interested in
Why didn’t most Americans support getting involved in the ww1?
o-na [289]

Answer:

When World War I began, many Americans were reluctant to join the war to avoid involvement in Europe's "petty squabbles" (as it saw them), and didn't feel that it was a threat to the US. They did send Britain essential war materials to help them during earlier parts of the war. The First World War saw a continuation of America's Isolationist policy, as the people of America didn't want to become involved in foreign affairs which didn't concern them. America did join the war, however, after Germany sank the Lusitania, killing 128 American citizens. They only entered the war for the last year though, and if they had come in sooner , the war might have ended much earlier.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
When analyzing a source, historians want to remain In other words, they don’t want to be by their personal feelings and opinions
oksian1 [2.3K]


The historian must be constantly and regularly looking for sources that enable his contact with historical events that have already taken place over time.


Historical events are opinions, thoughts, and social movements that have produced events and led to changes that have somehow impacted the life of a group or  people.



To understand these events, the historian defines the aspects that he will study, the sources to  be analyzed, the opinions he wishes to discuss and the feelings he deems most important.



The techniques, records, interviews, questions, data cataloging, among others, give security to carry out scientifically the work of the historian.


It should be remembered that no historical event is a 100% pure. The record of events always reflects, in one way or another, the opinion, thought and even the interests of the one who made notes about what he saw, lived or heard, but historians, when analyzing all the sources, must be as much objective as possible.



8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
GIVING THE BRAINLIEST TO CORRECT ANSWER
grigory [225]

Answer:

Party platform

Explanation: The party platform is the set of ideals a political group will run on and express the will of their consituents.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does Roosevelt mean when he says that "....It's independence, must ultimately realize that the right of such independence c
Brilliant_brown [7]

Meaning any wrong doing will cause the police to come and get them, and it also says that the United States and America deserves to be free and independant of a country.

3 0
4 years ago
MLK had a different viewpoint from Malcolm X on how African Americans should act in trying to gain civil rights. Based on this M
Vinil7 [7]

Answer: Like the activists of the Civil Rights Movement, their goal was complete racial equality. The main difference between the two movements was that supporters of Black Power were prepared to use violent methods to achieve these goals. Proponents of the Black Power Movement did not constitute a homogenous group. Malcolm X then served as the public face of the organization for a dozen years, where he advocated for Black empowerment, Black supremacy, and the separation of black and white Americans, and publicly criticized the mainstream civil rights movement for its emphasis on nonviolence and racial integration.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following Bill of Rights amendments is considered to be protective measurements of individual freedoms and rights?
    13·1 answer
  • How much was a canadian soldier paid in ww1?
    11·1 answer
  • In the era immediately following the coup that overthrew Jacobo Arbenz in 1954, how did the United States maintain its influence
    9·1 answer
  • When was the first wedding/marriage? Credible source plz
    12·1 answer
  • What is the pre-mechanical age?
    10·1 answer
  • How successful were Europeans in converting the Native people of the Americas to Christianity?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did pope gregory vii and henry iv come into conflict?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following events started the Red Scare?
    13·1 answer
  • N
    6·2 answers
  • Which description best describes the caste system in India?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!