1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
notsponge [240]
3 years ago
14

What is a valid defense to a lawsuit under the 1933 securities act?

Law
1 answer:
Zielflug [23.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The signer had performed a thorough investigation of the corporation's financial records. The defense is due diligence

Explanation:

A valid defense to a lawsuit under the 1933 securities act is that "the signer had performed a thorough investigation of the corporation's financial records. Therefore the defense is due diligence

You might be interested in
Which country is experiencing a trade deficit ?
Sloan [31]

Answer:B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How many different amendments are in the constitution
earnstyle [38]

Answer:

27

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Banks and credit unions include
qaws [65]

Answer:

banks are for-profit institutions, while credit unions are non-profit

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The Department of Homeland Security _____.
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for public security, roughly comparable to the interior or home ministries of other countries.

Child agencies: United States Citizenship and ...

Jurisdiction: United States

Formed: November 25, 2002; 18 years ag

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which two arguments support loose constructionism?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

7 1
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the U.S. government regulate lobbying in order to prevent unethical
    11·1 answer
  • Future changes in automobile technology are likely to include (select all that apply):
    15·1 answer
  • Conditions for ratification
    11·1 answer
  • All of the following statements about cooperative federalism are TRUE except:
    14·2 answers
  • In a typical ________ procedure, parties select a disinterested and informed party or parties to serve as a referee to determine
    6·2 answers
  • How long do representatives serve in<br> Articles of confederation
    7·1 answer
  • Look at the graph. Where P is price and Q is quantity, what might cause a move from B to A?
    5·1 answer
  • What can declare laws unconstitutional
    5·1 answer
  • Một hành vi có thể đồng thời là vi phạm pháp luật hình sự vừa là vi phạm pháp luật hành chính, nhưng không thể đồng thời vừa là
    10·1 answer
  • Blood stains are found layered on top of each other at a crime scene. This means that more than one person was injured and bleed
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!