Answer: Social justice is very important in life, and it very relatable to my quote. For social justice Is basically stating what you need for your community, or stating what you need in general. Usually speaking up, especially to for your rights, or for everybody’s rights takes courage. The fact that everyone’s benefit is in your hands, and a wealthier life comes from a wealthier government or associate. It also relates in other ways to. There are people here today who still protests for their rights, and certain people just tend to sit down and listen. For you never know what It can do for you. It may give you a better insight on what’s going on. Instead a lot of people are so busy standing up for their rights others, or standing up for what they feel like is their rights, or others, they get so caught up in their ego to realize it’s possibly just a little misunderstanding.
However, a closed mouth does not get fed. In certain situation’s you’ve tried to sit down and listen, then they use that t take control over you either mentally or physically. Nobody likes to be walked all over, so in order to fix that situation, communication is the best option. Social Justice is a very big part of life and this, because the fact that you’re looking for justice, and socially communicating, it brings in a combination to make (Social Justice). Just like we bring our words together, to make social interactions. They both match up. If there’s anything important in life, it’s your rights and your opinion. But don’t get it too twisted. Some of the times you just have to sit down, it’s a requirement that will really help you. This is why I believe my quote relates to social justice. All it takes is determination, ambition dedication and wisdom, life holds a future for you.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
She is relying on the primary source. This is because, the writer is first hand information about the experience of the author. What made it a primary source is also coupled with the fact that, the writer is the one that experience it and the one that is wrote the book based on his experience.
In an essay published in 1961, Robert Kelly coined the term "deep image" in reference to a new movement in American poetry. Ironically, the term grew in popularity despite the critical disapproval of it by the group's leading theorist and spokesperson, Robert Bly. Speaking with Ekbert Faas in 1974, Bly explains that the term deep image "suggests a geographical location in the psyche," rather than, as Bly prefers, a notion of the poetic image which involves psychic energy and movement (TM 259).1 In a later interview, Bly states:
Let's imagine a poem as if it were an animal. When animals run, they have considerable flowing rhythms. Also they have bodies. An image is simply a body where psychic energy is free to move around. Psychic energy can't move well in a non-image statement. (180)
Such vague and metaphorical theoretical statements are characteristic of Bly, who seems reluctant to speak about technique in conventional terms. Although the group's poetry is based on the image, nowhere has Bly set down a clear definition of the image or anything resembling a manifesto of technique. And unlike other "upstart" groups writing in the shadow of Pound and Eliot, the deep image poets-including Bly, Louis Simpson, William Stafford, and James Wright-lacked the equivalent of the Black Mountain group's "Projective Verse," or even, as in the Beats' "Howl," a central important poem which critics could use as a common point of reference. This essay, then, attempts to shed some light on the mystery surrounding the deep image aesthetic. It traces the theory and practice of Robert Bly's poetic image through the greater part of his literary career thus far.
