1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IgorLugansk [536]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following statements is a valid economic conclusion based on this information?

History
2 answers:
BARSIC [14]3 years ago
6 0
<span>it's the second one. it would be best for Sam to work only on making sales calls. </span>
grigory [225]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It would be best for Sam to work only on making sales calls.

Explanation:

To answer this question, it is necessary to understand a concept that economists call the cost of opportunity. Opportunity cost is a way of measuring the monetary loss that a person has when giving up a task to perform another task. For example, to make a sales call Sam fails to make 0.1 tax return. Similarly, for San to make a tax return, he fails to make .25 sales call.

So, to produce 30 sales call, Sam stops making 3 return taxes. Also, to make 28 return taxes, San ceases to make 7 sales call. In other words, the opportunity cost of producing Sam's tax returns is greater than the opportunity cost of making sales calls. Thus, the cost-of-opportunity analysis shows that for Sam, producing sales calls is more efficient.

You might be interested in
what were the major arguments for and against proportional representation of states in the national government ?
Novosadov [1.4K]

sorry. I do not now . I had that same question on a test and have not fond out the anwser yet.                                                                                                              

3 0
3 years ago
The Great Compromise, created by Roger Sherman,
const2013 [10]

Answer:

Option A, made all representation proportionate to the size of individual states, is the right answer.

Explanation:

  • The Sherman Compromise is also called the Great Compromise or the Connecticut compromise.
  • It was an agreement made between the small and the large states to define the power of each state would have in the Constitution of the United States and the legislature.
  • This compromise presented a dual system of congressional representation.
  • According to this compromise, each state, in the House of Representative, would be allocated seats in proportion to the population of its state.
  • Moreover, the same number of seats would be assigned to all the states in the Senate.
6 0
3 years ago
Which practice is most likely to have been supported by conservatives in Europe in the 1800s?
Alex787 [66]

Answer: A monarch made key political decisions based on input from advisors.

During the 1800s, most of Europe was still governed by monarchs. However, the republican, democratic example of the United States was heavily influential in liberal circles. Conservatives at that time period wanted to protect the institution of monarchy. So out of the options, it is more likely that conservatives would have supported keeping the monarch, while receiving input from advisors.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was Birmingham chosen as the site for a major Civil Rights Campaign ​
GalinKa [24]

Answer:

Birmingham was strictly segreagated, and blacks were restrcited to low income. Violence against blacks and black supporters was common. King thought that success in Birmingham would "radiate across the South." They knew they would have to prepare carefully this time.

7 0
3 years ago
Scientists have shown that a person's race is determined by a set of biological traits found in their DNA. Please select the bes
valentinak56 [21]

The answer is: false.

Race is an outdated concept that saw its most prominent day at the end of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century and its was the scientific justification for many racist practices. Nowadays it is a debunked concept that current science has shown flawed: it is proven that humanity is one single race with phenotypic differences that do not make up different races. What used to be considered different races are now considered merely different ethnic groups or populations (the first focuses on cultural traits and the latter on geographical coordinates).  

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A(n)
    12·1 answer
  • The "trail of tears (1838-1839)" was traveled during which president's administration?
    8·1 answer
  • What effect did the Black Plague have on art? a. There were no artists left alive. b. Artists portrayed images of death. c. Arti
    12·2 answers
  • According to greek mythology which god or goddess stopped growing when persephone was kiddnapped
    8·1 answer
  • What were the results of the proclamation of 1763 ?
    5·1 answer
  • Help me with 4 please ​
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement BEST explains the relationship between Enlightenment thought and the religious establishment
    10·1 answer
  • What TWO principles are associated with Jacksonian Democracy? A. strengthening the office of the president B. extending suffrage
    5·1 answer
  • What is the main idea of the Sedition Act?<br> Helppp
    7·1 answer
  • If the President and Congress disagree over a tax bill, the President can veto the bill. Which of
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!