1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IgorLugansk [536]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following statements is a valid economic conclusion based on this information?

History
2 answers:
BARSIC [14]3 years ago
6 0
<span>it's the second one. it would be best for Sam to work only on making sales calls. </span>
grigory [225]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It would be best for Sam to work only on making sales calls.

Explanation:

To answer this question, it is necessary to understand a concept that economists call the cost of opportunity. Opportunity cost is a way of measuring the monetary loss that a person has when giving up a task to perform another task. For example, to make a sales call Sam fails to make 0.1 tax return. Similarly, for San to make a tax return, he fails to make .25 sales call.

So, to produce 30 sales call, Sam stops making 3 return taxes. Also, to make 28 return taxes, San ceases to make 7 sales call. In other words, the opportunity cost of producing Sam's tax returns is greater than the opportunity cost of making sales calls. Thus, the cost-of-opportunity analysis shows that for Sam, producing sales calls is more efficient.

You might be interested in
Compare and contrast the fall of the Roman Empire with the fall of the Byzantine Empire. Describe at least one major similarity
Lesechka [4]

The main difference between the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire concerned the official religions they practiced. Whereas the Roman Empire was officially pagan up for most of its existence, the Byzantine Empire was Christian. The Byzantine Empire was the significant remnant of the Roman Empire that survived in southeastern Europe for a thousand years after the official fall of Rome in 476 CE. As noted, a key difference with Rome was that the Byzantine Empire was always Christian rather than pagan. This hardwired into Byzantium a lack of cultural openness to the kind of religious diversity that had helped classical Rome to expand and thrive.
Another important difference was the relative weakness of Byzantium vis-à-vis the Roman Republic's power in its heyday. While powerful in some ways, Byzantium did not function as a hegemonic cultural, political, and military superpower in the same way as did the classical Roman Empire. This had the downside of leaving western Europe vulnerable to attacks, particularly from Viking marauders, that would not have occurred under the Roman Empire, but this also created an upside in which the western Europeans were forced to create their own vibrant and flexible cultural, political, and military institutions and infrastructures in order to survive.
Byzantium remained crucially important, however, because it controlled Constantinople, the gateway to the Mediterranean as well the gateway to overland passages to Asia. This was a source of access to vital trade routes with the East that this remnant of the Roman empire safeguarded for western Europe. Unfortunately, however, unlike Rome in its heyday, Byzantium ultimately lacked military might to keep this territory from Muslim conquest.
7 0
2 years ago
13.
Marysya12 [62]

The purpose of Ibn Battuta's account was most likely to "inform his audience about the cultural, political, and economic characteristics of the places he visited"

This is because Ibn Battuta, famous for being an explorer and the author of "A Gift to Those Who Contemplate the Wonders of Cities and the Marvels of Travelling."

The book, which detailed the account of his travels and exploration, was written to show the readers the various socio-cultural, economic, and political characteristics he witnessed and experienced in all the places he traveled to.

Ibn Battuta was a famous Moroccan who was considered the foremost explorer of the pre-modern era.

Ibn Battuta lived between the year 1304 – 1368.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option D.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/18486097

3 0
2 years ago
Explain common land and how it was used.
KengaRu [80]

Answer:An archaic designation of property set aside and regulated by the local, state, or federal government for the benefit of the public for recreational purposes.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
The process in which production shifted from simple hand tools to
arlik [135]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

revolutionizing tools

6 0
2 years ago
Did the expansion of the federal government from 1825-1836 weaken or strengthen the United states of America
fgiga [73]

Answer:

Without a doubt the expansion strengthens the United States. Greatest occasion in the development of the federal government was the Common War, which set up its in-comparability over the states. The Common War carried a lot of new capacity to the central government, and laid the basis for the development of interest groups.

Explanation:

The primary significant occasion in the development of the federal government was the endorsement of the Constitution in 1789. Before that, the US was administered under the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution is habitually commended as an archive that secures the privileges of people and restricts the forces of government. In any case, an examination of the Constitution with the Articles uncovers that the polar opposite is valid. Under the Constitution the government acquired force, was less responsible, and had more noteworthy scope to decide its own extent of activity. That is the thing that the Constitution was planned to achieve.

The Constitution set up the Constituent School for the choice of presidents, however indicated no technique for picking balloters. A few strategies were utilized, however in many states the lawmaking bodies picked them. The composers expected that in many races no up-and-comer would get a lion's share of discretionary votes. That would allow the Place of Delegates to name the president from the five top discretionary vote getters. That framework never filled in as imagined, and by 1828, with the appointment of Andrew Jackson, the current arrangement of famous deciding in favor of balloters had gotten immovably settled in, and alongside it the gathering framework. From that point on, fruitful applicants owed their prosperity to the help of their gatherings, and consequently utilized the political framework to remunerate the individuals who assisted them with getting chosen.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • President bill clinton was impeached by the house of congress in 1998 on what charge
    15·2 answers
  • What was the significance of the Townshend Acts of 1767?
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP, Which of the following is an example of a lord?
    5·2 answers
  • When did the 300 spartans created
    10·1 answer
  • List three agreements made in the Missouri Compromise.
    14·2 answers
  • When there is a democracy, you will most likely find a socialist economy. (1 point) True False
    12·1 answer
  • WILL UPVOTE
    7·1 answer
  • How did religious beliefs influence the story of Rome’s founding?
    13·2 answers
  • Which two natural resources are readily available in Central Asia?
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the passing of the 14th Amendment important?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!