Answer:
I'm not sure if this is allowed to say as an answer, however a good example of cognitive dissonance is something like Smoking or using drugs, despite being aware of the adverse health effects of using both tobacco and drug use.
Explanation:
Why? Cognitive dissonance is a theory in social psychology. It usually refers to the mental conflict that occurs when a person’s behaviors and beliefs do not align. Because of this, it causes feelings of unease and tension, and people attempt to relieve this discomfort in different ways. Examples include “explaining things away” or rejecting new information that conflicts with their existing beliefs.
Think of it as a stress reliever, or an outlet for contradictions. More examples can include:
1. Choosing to promote a behavior, such as regular exercise, that a person does not themselves practice.
2. Telling a lie despite the person thinking of themselves as honest.
3. Purchasing a new car that is not fuel efficient, despite being environmentally conscious.
4. Eating meat while also thinking of themselves as an animal lover who dislikes the thought of killing animals.
Although I don't really have a personal example, here's one anyways:
Let’s say a woman smokes cigarettes despite knowing it can lead to lung cancer. She continues to do it because she tells herself she needs the cigarettes to help her deal with anxiety. Or maybe she’ll say she doesn’t smoke nearly enough cigarettes for them to cause serious harm. In this example, she’s reducing the dissonance by convincing herself the behavior is okay in her mind.
Hopefully this helped! :)
Answer:
Explanation:
Rakesh followed up on his best therapeutic understanding and confined his patient's eating routine - just this time his patient is his father. One of Desai's objectives is to address where moral limits lie in connection to applying Western logical standards to customary social circumstances: Ought to Rakesh have treated his father, surprisingly, similar to a patient? Would Rakesh have been abusing restorative morals on the off chance that he didn't have any significant bearing exacting standards to his father similarly he did to his different patients?
Two things occured because of Rakesh's limitations on his father's eating regimen. In any event one of these things likewise caused the change that overwhelmed Rakesh's character. One thing is that his rural community raised spouse selfishly and ungenerously enjoyed denying and depriving her father in-law of things he needed. The other is that the father bribed Rakesh's kids to get him the things he needed that Rakesh kept him from having. At the point when Rakesh found the deceit and the misleading, he was maddened, as any parent may be. He not just chided his father in the harshest terms- - something he had never done - he developed the confinements on and expanded the supervision of his eating routine.
The inquiry is raised regarding whether Rakesh's displeasure was supported; regardless of whether it had consistently been a piece of his character however not demonstrated in light of the fact that his father had never prompted it; was on the grounds that he esteemed his father a substandard and ruining impact. The story closes with a greater number of inquiries than it began with. Truth be told, there is an inquiry raised about the way of life that energizes such carefully characterized and communicated jobs that can be so ruinous when turned around or meddled with.