1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stepladder [879]
3 years ago
12

Which statement is the best counterargument to the statement "Younger drivers are more likely to be involved in an

History
1 answer:
Tatiana [17]3 years ago
8 0

Teen drivers are three times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash than drivers over age 20  is the best counterargument to the statement "Younger drivers are more likely to be involved in an  accident.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The given statements states that young drivers over age 20 are mostly the reason for accident. The counter statement states that teen age people are the cause of the accident which results in fatal crash. The young drivers will be age around 20 and teen drivers will be within 12 to 18.

But the fact is that it can happen with anyone irrespective of their age group. People, need to have proper driving experience and learning before they start driving in the real-time world.  

You might be interested in
After World War II the United States occupied Japan and replace it imperial government with
Aloiza [94]

Marxism–Leninism is one of the main communist ideologies. It was the official state ideology of the Soviet Union and other ruling parties of the Eastern Bloc as well as the Communist International after Bolshevisation.[1] The goal of Marxism–Leninism is the transformation of a capitalist state into a one-party socialist state, commonly referred to by Western academics as communist state,[2][3][4][5] to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat.[6] This would be achieved by a revolution led by a vanguard party, who would be organized hierarchically and make decisions through democratic centralism.[7][8][9] The state would control the economy and means of production,[10] promote collectivism in society, suppress political dissent[9][10] and pave the way for an eventual communist society which would be both classless and stateless.[7] Marxist–Leninists generally support internationalism and oppose capitalism, fascism, imperialism and liberal democracy. As an ideology, it was developed by Joseph Stalin in the late 1920s based on his understanding and synthesis of both orthodox Marxism and Leninism.[11] Today, Marxism–Leninism is the ideology of Stalinist and Maoist political parties and remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.[7]

After the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924, Marxism–Leninism became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union when Stalin and his supporters gained control of the party. It rejected the common notions among Western Marxists of world revolution, as a prerequisite for building socialism, in favour of the concept of socialism in one country. According to its supporters, the gradual transition from capitalism to socialism was signified by the introduction of the first five-year plan and the 1936 Soviet Constitution. The internationalism of Marxism–Leninism was expressed in supporting revolutions in other countries (e.g. initially through the Communist International or through the concept of socialist-leaning countries after de-Stalinisation). By the late 1920s, Stalin established ideological orthodoxy among the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks), the Soviet Union and the Communist International to establish universal Marxist–Leninist praxis.[12][13] In the late 1930s, Stalin's official textbook History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks) (1938) popularised the term Marxism–Leninism among communists and non-communists.[14]

Marxism–Leninist philosophy has been criticised by a broad political spectrum both on the left and right. Marxist–Leninist rule has been especially criticised, including by other socialists such as anarchists, communists, democratic socialists, libertarian socialists and Marxists. Marxist–Leninist states have been described as authoritarian, or accused of being totalitarian, for enacting repressions and killings of political dissidents and social classes (so-called "enemies of the people"), religious persecution, ethnic cleansing, forced collectivisation and use of forced labor in concentration camps.[15][8][16] Such states have been accused of genocidal acts in China, Poland and Ukraine.[17][18][19][20] Anti-Stalinist left and other left-wing critics see it as an example of state capitalism[21][22] and have referred to it as a "red fascism" contrary to left-wing politics.[23][24][25] Other leftists, including Marxist–Leninists, have criticised it for its repressive state actions while recognising certain advancements such as egalitarian achievements and modernisation under such states.[26][27] The socio-economic nature of Marxist–Leninist states has also been much debated, varyingly being labelled a form of bureaucratic collectivism, state capitalism, state socialism, or a totally unique mode of production

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which to enlightenment ideas are found in the US Constitution
yanalaym [24]
John Locke's ideas<span> are once again found in an American document. His </span>ideas<span> of the people getting to choose their leaders or the power lies with the people is ever present in the </span>US<span>. Montesquieu's </span>ideas<span> were also used in the </span>US constitution<span>. Montesquieu believed in the separation of power with checks and balances.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Because of Medicaid and Medicare, whose administration was seen as making great strides in health care? Answer John F. Kennedy R
BabaBlast [244]
Because of Medicaid and Medicare, it was the administration of "Lyndon Johnson" that was seen as making great strides in health care, since Johnson wanted to improve the lives of average Americans. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What African Americans remained enslaved even after the Emancipation<br> Proclamation?
lora16 [44]

Answer : I believe it was 10%

I hope I can help you :)

Have a good day :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the colonists respond to a call to arm themselves against the British
inessss [21]
At first the colonists did not agree with the rebellion against britian, over time though taxation without reprensation and british impressment of the u.s 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • these photographs indicate the people of china and the people of ancient peru modified their environment is?
    10·1 answer
  • What set off a European scramble for African territories
    5·1 answer
  • One of the similarities between the Florida Constitution and the U.S. Constitution is that all bills for raising revenue ( taxes
    11·1 answer
  • Which Chinese philosophy had a major influence in shaping the values of medieval Japan?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the geocentric theory ?
    10·1 answer
  • What land forms were created by the shifting of our tectonics plates
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the first president to take the oath of office in the white house?
    6·1 answer
  • Woooohoooooo<br><br> LIMITED TIME 10 POINTS PLUS BRAINLIEST!
    9·1 answer
  • Describe one development that contributed isolationist sentiment in the United States from 1919 to 1940.
    15·1 answer
  • In the 13th century, who was the most
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!