The sentence from the passage that best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate is: The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didn't have as much supporting evidence.
A parliamentary debate is held in academic settings and it originated from the British Parliament. In a parliamentary debate their are two sides who have their own points and support them with evidence.
In the chosen option, we see that the Taft team had a counterclaim. Even though they were making an argument, they did not have a supporting evidence.
This shows that they were engaging in a parliamentary debate that they were not properly prepared for.
Learn more about parliamentary debates here:
brainly.com/question/1695492
Answer:
it is both, equally, doubted, sigh
Explanation:
the 4th option
Answer:
the exposition includes an introduction of Rainsford and the discussion on animals' feelings, the rising action includes the introduction of Zaroff and his hunt of Rainsford, the climax is when Rainsford is presumed dead, the falling action is when Zaroff returns home, and the resolution ...
Explanation:
<span>Conflict
is happens when either one of the individuals have misunderstanding or are
reaching over the same goal. The possible advices one can give to people in
conflict are (1) talk things out, (2) listen to the side of the other, (3) be
open-minded, (4) when explaining, explain it well, (5) face your
responsibilities whether good or bad and (6) do not include people who are not
part of the conflict, keep it among yourselves.</span>
