No it is not true that if the statement, \"if it is cold, then i wear a jacket," is assumed to be true, is it converse, \"if i wear a jacket, then it must be cold," also <span>always true. The correct option among the two options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a". I hope it helps you.</span>
Conditional statements like "if it is cold, then I wear a jacket" are composed of a hypothesis that in this case is "if it is cold" and a possible result or conclusion "then I wear a jacket" that are closely connected to each other. This type of statements can be changed into converse statements by interchanging the hypothesis for the conclusion, this statements are valid in some cases but n most cases they are not considering the result or conclusion which in this case is "then I wear a jacket" can be related to multiple, for example, you can wear a jacket just because you like doing this or you feel cold, but not only because the weather is cold. Therefore, it is not tur the converse statement is true just because the original statement was true.
Answer: A. Any information gathered about this question is subjective.
Explanation: The meaning of subjective is bias opinions influenced by likes and dislikes. To write something like this, is to developed bias opinion not to give information or debate.
"Keep", "factor", and "calculate" are all verbs in the list of things the new system allows teachers to do. The other sentences are inconsistent with their list of verbs/adjectives/nouns. Thus, option D is the only one that is grammatically correct.
I am not too good at explaining, so let me know if you are still confused.
