Try to avoid judging international business partners
Answer:
P₀ = $59.45
Explanation:
the numbers are missing so I looked for a similar question:
- expected EPS = $2.775
- retain 0% of earnings (years 1 - 2)
- retain 48% of earnings (years 3 - 4)
- then retain 23%
- expected return on new projects = 22.4%
- Re = 10.7%
growth rate = retention rate x return on new projects
g₁ = not given EPS₁ = $2.775
g₂ = 1 x 22.4% = 22.4% EPS₂ = $3.3966
g₃ = 1 x 22.4% = 22.4% EPS₃ = $4.1574
g₄ = 0.48 x 22.4% = 10.752% EPS₄ = $4.6044
g₅ = 0.48 x 22.4% = 10.752% EPS₅ = $5.0995
g₆ = 0.23 x 22.4% = 5.152% EPS₆ = $5.3622
dividend payout ratio expected dividend
year 1 = 0 $0
year 2 = 0 $0
year 3 = 0.52 $2.1618
year 4 = 0.52 $2.3943
year 5 = 0.77 $3.9266
year 6 = 0.77 $4.1289
since the growth rate became constant at year 6, we can find the terminal value for year 5:
terminal value year 5 = $4.1289 / (10.7 - 5.152%) = $74.4214
P₀ = $0/1.07 + $0/1.07² + $2.1618/1.07³ + $2.3943/1.07⁴ + $3.9266/1.07⁵ + $74.4214/1.07⁵ = $0 + $0 + $1.7647 + $1.8266 + $2.7996 + $53.0614 = $59.45
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
A judicial notice is defined as a rule concerning recognition not evidence by a court where a fact that is very well known and attested that there is no room for doubting the fact.
There is no need for formal presentation of evidence.
I'm the given scenario the plaintiff produced three well-known chemistry texts containing explanations of the formula and asked the court to take judicial notice of the formula for the compound.
Since the formula is well known and even contained in well known chemistry texts, the court should take judicial notice of the formula
