1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Misha Larkins [42]
3 years ago
10

describe the similarities and differences between the new American immigrants and Protestant workers.

History
2 answers:
kkurt [141]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The similarities between Protestant workers and new American immigrants are that both come to the U.S. to better their conditions. One of the differences between Protestant workers and New American immigrants is that Protestant Workers came from another continent and had to cross an ocean to get here. Most of the New Immigrants are looking for work and many Protestant workers were escaping political or religious persecution.  

Explanation:

<em>Many immigrants have moved for opportunity and jobs throughout this nation’s history, and this is something that all immigrants have in common. Most New American immigrants live in cities and most get here through family sponsorship. Not all protestant workers arrived in cities initially and because many were escaping political or religious persecution, they left their previous lives behind them deciding to build their culture and ideologies to adapt to their new country.  </em>

<em />

<em>Around the turn of the 20th century, America became the world’s largest industrial power and went from being predominantly rural to largely urban. New York and Chicago experienced massive growth. At the end of the 19th century, immigration gave us the first wave of colonization by English people, Spanish people, and other mostly protestant Europeans. There was a new wave with Scandinavians, French people, and especially the Irish. They had primarily been farmers in the motherland, but in America, they tended to stay in cities, like Boston and New York.  </em>

<em />

<em>The second largest wave of immigrants was made up of German speakers, including a number of liberals who left after the abortive revolutions of 1848. Most of the men began their working lives as low-wage unskilled laborers, but over time they came to have much more varied job opportunities. New immigrants are more likely than previous immigrants to be Jewish or Catholic. </em>

ivanzaharov [21]3 years ago
3 0
<span>the union. It is a federal entity within Mexico which is not part of any one of the but belongs to the federation as a whole. Mexico City is the country's largest city as well as its most important political, cultural, educational and financial center.</span><span>As an "alpha"  Mexico City is one of the most important financial centers in the Americas. It is located in the (Valle de México), a large valley in the high  at the center of Mexico, at an altitude of 2,240 metres (7,350 ft). The city consists of sixteen .</span>
You might be interested in
Quite a bit of land resulting from this Act was purchased by land speculators
bulgar [2K]
Quite a bit land resulting from the Morrill-Land Grant Act was purchased by land speculators. The correct answer is Morrill-Land Grant Act. 
7 0
3 years ago
How is genetic variation measured? (I check for plagiarism so DONT)
siniylev [52]

Answer:

Relative genotype frequency and relative allele frequency

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which branch of the national government guards the rights of the people?
Vitek1552 [10]
The Supreme Court's role is to interpret the Constitution and limit the powers of the other branches<span> of government. The Supreme Court's power to do this is its power of</span>judicial<span> review, where it determines which laws and policies are constitutional, or allowable, and which are not.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe two benefits and two challenges of transitioning to a democratic form of government.
sammy [17]

Answer:

In modern political thought, there are two approaches to the justification of democracy as the best system of government: value-based and rationally utilitarian. Value justifications regard democracy as a value in itself, as a political system that most fully embodies the most important humanistic values: freedom, equality, justice, etc.

The value approach is criticized primarily for its appeal to a democratically minded person who is truly striving for freedom and political equality. However, in the modern world, very many people, if not most, prefer not freedom (which they often perceive even as anti-value), but material well-being, security, and order. Therefore, they put a non-political, social meaning in the most respected values ​​of equality and justice, linking them to ensuring equal opportunities in life or rewarding merit, to which real democracy has a very weak relationship. All this casts doubt on the value group of arguments in favor of democracy.

A rational-utilitarian approach does not deny the certain significance of the value justifications of democracy, but at the same time pushes them to the background. This approach interprets democracy primarily as the most rational, useful way for citizens to organize a political system, allowing them to articulate and harmoniously combine their interests. The most consistently rational-utilitarian group of arguments is expressed in the systemic justifications of democracy: Democracy helps to prevent the rule of dictators, curb power, guarantee the protection of citizens from state arbitrariness; Democracy provides a higher level of economic development and higher rates of economic growth.

Of course, democracy, like any other political system, is not free from serious shortcomings, which, in fact, represent a continuation of its merits. Usually attention is paid to the following weaknesses of democracy:

1. The threat of destabilization of the political system arising from the very principle of election.

2. Political competition can result in conflictogenicity, confrontation, open clashes and, therefore, destabilization of the situation in society.

3. The danger of the tyranny of the majority, confident in its "rightness" and suppressing the will of those who remain in the minority.

4. Possible unprofessionalism of officials elected by an incompetent majority.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
ARe the seven principles still important to this day why or why not?
LiRa [457]

Answer:

The Seven Principles of Leave No Trace provide an easily understood framework of minimum impact practices for anyone visiting the outdoors. Although Leave No Trace has its roots in backcountry settings, the Principles have been adapted so that they can be applied anywhere — from remote wilderness areas, to local parks and even in your own backyard. They also apply to almost every recreational activity. Each Principle covers a specific topic and provides detailed information for minimizing impacts.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a critical advantage of the allies over the allies over the Axis Powers during world was II? A) the s
    8·1 answer
  • Are the Philippines East of Vietnam?
    12·2 answers
  • Write the name of drungkhags​
    12·1 answer
  • Imagine that you are an adviser to either China's emperor or Japan's shogun. Write a letter advising the ruler whether you suppo
    10·1 answer
  • How is Serf important in Medieval Europe?
    9·1 answer
  • 7. Describe the strategic, political, and operational aspects of human resources management. Give examples.
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following would not use a GPS device to find directions?
    10·2 answers
  • Sixty million years ago, the (blank) was (blank) than it is today.​
    7·1 answer
  • The Soviet Union's approach to security differed from the US approach because the Soviets sought to
    9·2 answers
  • What part of a ship is the prow
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!