Answer:
Infinitive-Adverb
Explanation:
As we know, an adverb is characterized as a word that functions to describe or modify an adjective, verb, or another adverb.
As per the question, <u>the given sentence employs an 'infinitive adverb' i.e. 'to go' because this non-finite verb is functioning to modify the main verb 'allowed' by adding details about it.</u> It answers the question 'allowed what?' by replying 'to go.' It cannot be participle as there is no use of participle in the sentence except for the main verb and hence, options A and B are incorrect. Option D is incorrect as infinitive is not employed as an adjective to modify a noun. Therefore, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
A non-Us citizen who has not been involved in a conflict with the United States and for those who have applied for US citizenship are eligible for land ownership under the Homestead Act. Approximately 10 percent of US total land mass is given away to the eligible applicants.
I don’t understand pls explain better
Answer:
The answer
Explanation:
A rhetorical question is of course there are those who argue that Hector's numerous other victories make him a candidate for the greatest Trojan. here I use Repetition, But I strongly disagree with this. my Opinions given as fact is Hector's armies led him to victory. I would like imply the applicable imperatives here and declare that Hector hid shamefully behind his soldiers and barely faced battle himself. making use of the emotive language of sheer admiration, being thrilled and feeling immense prouder, not using hyperbole announces that Whereas Paris looked his enemy in the eye like a courageous leader should and offered his life to spare the lives of others. Appealing directly to the reader Did Hector ever make such a selfless offer.
The answer is complex because it has two parts and NO conjunction
