It depends. The true definition, with is roughly law without force, then it wouldn't be too bad. Sounds like it would just be a non corrupt world. However, modern day groups like ANTIFA, it would suck. Things have been blown out of proportion honestly to the point where anarchy, or "anti-fascism", almost looks like fascism.
When World War I ended in 1918, the British took control of Palestine. The League of Nations issued a British mandate for Palestine—a document that gave Britain administrative control over the region, and included provisions for establishing a Jewish national homeland in Palestine—which went into effect in 1923
Well a couple of things come into play here but look at the word "new"; it was the new perspective of the South after the end of the Reconstruction.
What could be done to replace Southern economy, now that it was no longer relying on slavery *hint* they could no longer rely on sharecropping, they had to modernize The South, it had to industrialize itself if the economy was to be on par with the North.
IF THERE WERE MULTIPLE CHOICE PLEASE LIST THE OPTIONS.
Soviet controled Stalin had a great impact on space technology and arts. It is Soviet successful launch of the sputnik that spurred a space war, that ended with American manned landing on the moon.
The soviet union under Stalin in addition led to a number of break through discoveries in nuclear science,weapons and equipments.
In arts, contemporary movie industry was heavily influence by the Soviet-USA conflict.
