<span>The flawed logic in this statement exemplifies A) post hoc. Post hoc is a result of something that occurs after a particular event, that also contains flawed assumption that this result has a logical relationship with the represented event. As you can see, this sentence is build following the principle cause and effect, but if you pay attention to the contents you will see that it makes no sense.</span>
The answer is b sorry If I’m wrong
C
explanation: because i said so lol
Answer:
C). Sentence Fragment.
Explanation:
A sentence fragment is described as an incomplete sentence; a phrase or clause that is punctuated and capitalized like a sentence but does not constitute a complete grammatical sentence. It is usually caused by the failure to include a subject and a verb, or as the result of beginning a sentence with a subordinate conjunction or relative pronoun.
The given is a 'sentence fragment' error as it conveys a partial meaning. It is incomplete as it begins with a subordinating conjunction('if...know') and without accomplishing a complete meaning it ends abruptly. A dependent clause must always be followed by an independent clause to accomplish its meaning but here, it is immediately followed by a dependent clause beginning with another relative clause('how...end'). Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
